The Reason Atheists Sneer

By Alex Linder

[ The following is from a blog posting. ]

It’s very simple. We have to use logic and evidence to explain our beliefs whereas xtian retards just barf out fantasies (called revelations, or more accurately hallucinations) and demand they be put on par with evidence. They special plead without admitting it. The jewier christians have the chutzpah to claim it’s atheists who are special pleading, since most “people” believe in God. It’s kind of like the left calling us “fascists.” No right wing person has ever been afraid of debating a leftist. The fear and the attempted tyranny is a one-way street. It’s always judeo-left trying to shut people down, to no-platform them, to literally attack them and burn down the setting. It’s been this way forever. ALL WHITES ARE NAZIS – AND WHAT DO WE DO WITH NAZIS? If I were an anti, that’s how I’d sloganize it. It accurately sums up the judeo-left’s true beliefs and behavior. ALL WHITES MUST DIE.

What I Mean by Maloccs

By Alex Linder

[ The following is from a blog posting. ]

Short for malocclusives (their teeth dont fit right). The photos of the 23 anarchs busted in Portland. The commies did 100k damage in Philadelphia, proving they’re competitive with those in Berkeley, who did about the same. Here on Dems rigging primaries.

Jews know what they deserve. Among themselves, they know the truth. Whites who claim jews are ‘self-delusional’ are wrong. They are liars. They are a race of liars, swindlers and murderers, and they always have been. It’s their culture, and it’s “gone to seed,” as the late lawyer Edgar Steele used to say, meaning that their criminality, lying and propensity to murder are in their genes, not just their culture. It all works together to make them a master criminal race. WHITE GENOCIDE IS (((THEIR))) PLAN: COUNTER-(((EXTERMINATION))) IS OURS.

Polarization

By Alex Linder

[ The following is from a blog posting. ]

Don’t let anyone kid you or try to lie: the split is Team White v Team Jew. Anyone who says otherwise is trying to split things for their own profit, typically civic nationalists. The people who produced AmeriKwa, the mess our nation has become, are jews. And the ones who oppose them are Whites – conscious, proud, willing-to-fight, white men, who demand White sovereignty. We will not live as slaves of the jew, we will destroy this mad-dog race and regain our sovereignty. Right now people can’t see what I write because, like something in depths of lake, it’s not close enough to the surface, but as it rises, as violence becomes more common, as the split starkens, it will be clear that what I say is correct: this all boils down to Team White (White Nationalists + allied nationalists) vs Team Jew (jews + minorities and whiteskin maloccs). Link is to Tyler Durden at Zero Hedge, his view on violence and Second Civil War. Notice that all the peripheral areas are being drawn in to the white racial struggle. They have their perspectives, but they are undeniably concerned with and roughly seeing what white racialists have been talking about for the last two decades. I include financial red-pillers (LRC types like Doug Casey, ZH’s Durden), minimalists (they don’t discuss it, but I believe they know it; I might be wrong), MGTOW (some will try to deny it, but there’s no denying the persecution of the white man as MAN runs in parallel with the persecution of the white man as WHITE). Here on the commie-prog mentality, ie the Brezhnev Doctrine: what we have is ours forever; what’s yours is in play. Z-man isn’t a great commentator, he doesn’t get to the heart of it, which is that the left = jews = ‘religious’ belief that all the goods in the world belong to them.

ITZ THE JEWS

By Alex Linder

[ The following is from a blog posting. ]

It’s the jews. Yep. Even in Sweden. Why is it so difficult for whiteskins to make even one-step logical connections? If it’s not a racial deficit, it must be induced by something external. There, the culprit must be christianity. And, in last 150 years, what I call Monday School as well (public education). Sunday School = religious instruction. So does Monday School. That what is served in public “schools” isn’t called religious doesn’t mean it’s not just as unfounded and absolute – it is. just because something is called “science” or “education” doesn’t mean its contents are scientific or educational. “Climate change” is (((socialism))), meant to further the goals of the New World Order by entrenching a global tax on whites; “sex education” is sexual exposure, inteded to rough up and immoralize children before they are old enough to begin thinking about such things. … One of Jared Taylor’s favorite lies, to persuade his dopes that whites are committing suicide, was that Sweden – there are no jews there. It’s just whites. Well, here’s the refutation, complete with pictures, titles and facts. Jared Taylor, it should always be remembered, is a liar. He serves the jews.



Hello? I heard there was an opening for third position on the Thompson Twins?

Christianity is Anti-White

By Alex Linder

[ The following is from a blog posting. ]

#TeamWhite – Jan and I do a show about Christianity. I come on about 27th minute. We don’t agree on way to approach this matter. Jan believes in a more diplomatic approach, I believe christians, like all, need the truth flat out. Christianity is anti-white by doctrine, and most christians don’t even understand their church’s doctrines as they relate to race. Combine that with general white natural and learned antipathy to consistency, you end up with people who basically look at the world as a sort of buffet, where you can eat whatever you want, and why should anyone complain. Christianity is universalist. This cannot change. God created all men, this means, and all men need Jesus. The gum-wrapper-silver change from this golden pyrrite is that blacks are Image Bearers. Which is particularly funny when you combine it with nigger criminals. But the minute you agree that other species have the right to exist, you are going against nature, in which they drive each other completely out of mutually occupied space. Anyway, just listen. I have never heard anyone argue what I did in this, namely the God-supports-genocide argument. It’s not my argument of course, it’s an argument a religious believer could use to support White Nationalism. But I have never heard a believer use it.

Whatever You Run From, That’s What They’ll Call You

By Alex Linder

[ The following is from a blog posting. ]

What you are is up to you; what (((they))) call you is up to them. We don’t understand this because our mind is clouded by our jesus cult. We believe there’s some kind of truth or Justice or God overseeing everything, some kind of objective reality that is somehow respected by both parties, at some level. No. Only our side respects objective reality. The other side only cares about what works. If you spend your time trying to correct knowing liars, you are a fool, and wasting time in which you should be attacking the jew-bolsheviks. Stop worrying about what they call you because you can’t control that, and we have decades of experience (I personally have experience with this back to the 80s, already four decades now) that your whiteness alone is enough for them to call you a nazi or racist, regardless of your beliefs. THEY HATE YOU FOR WHAT YOUR ARE. This means, as  has been put over the years, YOUR SKIN COLOR IS YOUR UNIFORM (George Lincoln Rockwell, I think); and, YOUR RACE IS YOUR NATION (Eric Thompson). Be settled in your soul – resolve to fight. Worrying about “how we look” is for girls choosing dresses. Fighting is for men.

NY Mag Runs Longest Piece(s) on Alt-Right Yet

By Alex Linder

[ The following is from a blog posting. ]


Deliberately misrepresenting it to fool people. Dozens of writers/analysts all ignore that alt-right either means white racialism or nothing. Dozens of analysts/writers, yet not one mentions that the alt-right is uniformly anti-jew. I believe this is the most significant thing about the entire article. It’s not one article, it’s a bunch, from many different people. Not one of them observes that the ‘alt-right’ sees jews as a big problem, let alone as The Problem. Don’t tell me that people who are aware of myriad insigificant details related to the movement aren’t consciously avoiding mentioning the heart of it. It’s deliberate misrepresentation. NYM doesn’t want young whites to realize that exciting young whites see jews as The Problem. This report has the form of an ‘explainer,’ but in fact it is an attempted reframing. Similar to what (((Milo))) did in his Breitbart piece. He at least mentioned the anti-jew stuff, he just treated it as a joke. In other words, he lied. Flat out, straight up, with full knowledged lied. Of course, he’s a jew. It what dey do. So these NY Mag sids n squids try to cast alt-right as the latest irrational irruption of White Supremacy, that old tyme hate religion. Like every other jew source, they can’t admit whites have interests, like other groups. No, if whites pretend they have interests, it’s only a ruse to lubricate their screwing of other groups, which is their nature and their history. This is monstrously absurd, but it is a charade explanation they have kept up with a straight face for, what, 100 years now? The term ‘racism,’ which was intended to destroy the west, was created by jew Trotsky roughly ninety years ago, a longer running shitsmear than Cats on Broadway. So racialism today as alt-right is some kind of neo-paleoconservatism, which they can semi-plausibly, but dishonestly and inaccurately claim, by pointing to its origins with (((Paul Gottfried))) and his former employee Richard Spencer. There was a day in living memory, about ten years ago, when jew Gottfried instructed Spencer to “Get them down,” them being pro-white comments that kicked the ass of the paleocons at Takimag. (White Nationalists were posting there, me included, but others mainly, making the paleocons look like the feeble losers they are. Indeed, Gottfried has used my coinage Faileocons in one of his articles.) We have that command linked at VNNForum, although I don’t have it to hand. But that’s the milieu that Gottfried/Spencer’s alternative right/alt-right emerged from. The jews and jew-turned goyeem at NY Mag try to obscure two main things: whites have no interest in continued forced association with jews/coloreds via the unkind offices of the United States of America’s central government; 2) every last tadpole on the ‘alt-right’ recognizes that jews are the root of the problem their race faces. Of course, jews like those producing NY Mag can’t allow consideration of either point. If you acknowledge whites have interests, then something called white racialism or white nationalism or alt-right inevitably takes the shape it does. But they can’t do this – it’s impolitic. If they treated whites honestly, they open themselves to a thousand rational points – points they can’t answer. So they always call anyone not anti-white a ‘White supremacist,’ in order to keep up the charade that white interests are inherently invalid, and that anyone pretending otherwise is only doing it out of malicious desire to hurt other races (which is all whites ever do, according to the jewish Big Lie presented as history to innocent school children). Forgive my pleonasm. These points do bear repeating. From NY Mag. To understand this new right, it helps to see it not as a fringe movement, but a powerful counterculture. That makes sense. It’s opposition to the (((Bolshesphere))). Look at the graphic. Look at all those jews. Conclusion: the jews at NY Mag are trying to sell you that jews are part of the ‘alt-right.’ Remember that jews always operate “by way of deception,” which is literally the motto of Mossad. So all these jews slide into any new thing, as jews try to create personalities and front groups. Molyneaux is a full-blooded jew – he says on tape his mother was a jew, in Berlin of all places. Gee, doesn’t look the part, does he? But he is. Then there’s Milo. He’s a jew too. Even says he’s not part of the alt-right. But somehow he’s lumped in there. Remember the old saw we talked about in the early 2000s, it remains true: any group that doesn’t exclude jews and name them the enemy will in time be taken over by them. Ignore it at your peril, and watch the alt-right become just another safe, feckless, impotent Conservatism 2.0 or 3.0 or 85.0.

Nazi the Term, the Reality, the Epithet – the Meanings to Whites

By Alex Linder

[ The following is from a blog posting. ]


You see, even if you realize that objectively nazis are lied about in nearly every particular by the descendants of the jew-bolsheviks they nearly defeated, the J-Bs have succeeded in perhaps the deeper sense of making us all, WN or conservative or any other school of white, feel that the nazis were in some real sense different from us. They were not. Hitler and crew did not go out there intending to beat the fuck out of anyone they came across. They went out to tell their fellow public Germans about the horrors of communism, and offer them leadership. It was the communists who initiated the physical attacks. Just as we’ve seen in 2017 at Berkeley (and other places). The Nazis responded by developing defense cadres, which became the Brownshirts, the SA. Which was originally a meeting hall protection detachment – because the communists were hell-bent on not allowing them to speak, even in halls they rented. The left doesn’t change. It still acts the same way. So we find ourselves following the paths the Nazis did because if we don’t fight back, we will be shut down too. The Nazis were normal Germans who spoke the truth and didn’t back down from physical challenges – and, yes, that does make them profoundly different from Anglo conservatives. But the time for Anglophone politics, the lying and backroom deals, is drawing to a close, and the time of serious politics pulls into the station. Eternity asks the question: which of us whiteskins are willing to rise up and defend our race and claim our racial freedom? And why call these clowns by the dishonest name they choose: antifa. Better to call them communists, which is what they are. … Think about the logic of the thing. Do “they” or (((they))) call all whites Nazis? You know they do. Well how did they treat the original Nazis? Yeah. Are they not then saying the same thing that they did to the original Nazis must now be done to ALL WHITES? It is logically unavoidable. And we have them on tape, (((Ignatiev)), (((Sontag))), (((Tim Wise))) et al., saying just that (if you were under any confusion). It’s a racial war of extermination enjoined, and it’s somewhere between simmering and full boil.

USA Exists Solely to Serve Israel

By Alex Linder

[ The following is from a blog posting. ]

A bill to monitor “anti-semitism” (sic) in Europe. The three functions of the US government: to maintain a database on/prison space for anyone on earth who even thinks about criticizing jews, 2) to give Israel free money and materiel , 3) to raise armies to slaughter any nation around the world the kikes don’t like. If you’re white and young and you want a future, you can have it. But you’ll have to fight for it. You have the world to win. Time to put down the phone and create a revolution.

DiLorenzo Bashes the Pope for Bashing What He Oddly Calls Libertarian Individualism

By Alex Linder

[ The following is from a blog posting. ]

DiLorenzo Bashes the Pope for Bashing What He Oddly Calls Libertarian Individualism
The last thing we have today is what the pope calls libertarian individualism. But DiLorenzeo then gets as cattywampus himself in attacking Nazis and fascists by refusing to acknowledge, with typical libertarian cowardice and intellectual dishonesty, the mattering point: their societies were under attack by #TeamJew aka the communists, the jewish bolsheviks, as the Nazis called them. All Europe was. How does a libertarian propose to address that attack? How can whites resist a collective attack by uncoordinated, individual means? They can’t. The situation was desperate. DiLorenzo doesn’t even address that very real and scary reality — you know, the one that led to tens of millions of deaths. Just what was Germany supposed to do? It already had a foretaste in the Bavarian Republic, created by jew communists. It saw what happened in Hungary under jew Bela Kun. Just what is Germany supposed to do? This is exactly like these idiot conservatives today who react to nigger crimes by talking about concealed carry. Sure, that might help you some, but it’s not a solution. The solution is getting these niggers under collective control. So it was in 20s and 30s Europe with the jews. All kinds of quotations attest to this – all kinds of diplomats, businessmen, even journalists talking about The Absolute Horror and Global Danger that was the jew-created Soviet Union. They were right. And this libertarian weenie, so estimable in some ways, acts as if the entire point of Mussolini’s fascism or Hitler’s national socialism were to prevent people from starting businesses. The libertarian really is an odd bird. He loves calling for freedom and styling himself a free man, but he always turtles or goes crabways where the actual battle is joined. See, existence precedes freedom. If you don’t exist, because some other race wiped you out (which is after all nothing other than nature’s way), then you don’t have to worry about taxes or red tape, do you. While the libertarian worries about red tape as the ultimate evil, Hitler is worried about the spilling of red Aryan blood by the Jewmonster. Who is dealing with reality, and who is closing his eyes and sticking his fingers in his ears? That would be the DiLorenzos. Just like the collectivist left, DiLorenzo can easily spot a racist (save it’s a jew) but what he can’t do is tell you why racism, a dirty jew word for everything from white racial observation to collective defense is wrong. Nor can he explain what’s wrong with Lincoln, whom he never tires of citing for his desire to ship American-located Africans back to Africa. It’s one thing to be pro-individual, but if this makes you blind to the fact that hominids see themselves as part of groups, and this is a very real identity, and they attack others groups on that basis, then what is the point? Humans are obviously individuals and group members, to say anthing else is to evade actual reality in the usual reductionist way. It is to turn to ideology to avoid actual reality – always a bad and unmanly idea.