It and Essence

On Race, Media and the NFL
Sports is politics by other means

By Alex Linder

[ The following is from a forum thread posting. ]

January 23, 2014

The season is over. As I predicted, Nick Foles soon came in for Michael Vick, who got injured as he always does. I thought Foles would do well. He didn’t. He did extremely well. No one saw it coming, except maybe him. He threw dozens of TD passes and almost no interceptions. He exhibited exemplary poise. He performed creditably in his maiden playoff game, bowing to New Orleans by two points. It looks like a bright future for ‘rookies’ Foles and Coach Chip Kelly and their exciting, uptempo, new-to-the-NFL offense.

The media pumped hard for Vick. He’s not only black and speedy, and did I say black, he’s proof that negros can reform. He and his thugs abused dogs, when they weren’t spreading herpes or smoking weed. He went to prison for it. He came out and went to Philadelphia to be rehabilitated under Andy Reid. He had a little success, but not that much. He did what he has always done. Run around wildly. Be exciting. Fail at reading defenses. Get smashed and injured. Throw INTs and lose games. In short, and Vick is short, same old same old. It was predictable. Foles should have been starting at least a year ago.

The media were very unhappy when Vick went out with an injury early in the season. They wanted him back, stat. Nick Foles replaced him. He had a bad game early against Dallas. Professional (black) loudmouth Stephen A. Smith of ESPN’s morning show First Take did his unhumorous-laughing routine to imply I-told-you-so. Scoffing at the very notion some silly white boy could replace the colored champion that is Michael Vick. Even though Vick is undersized, old, and dumb, black makes up for all that. Roughly 99% of black sportswriters and talking heads will support a black QB for racial reasons alone, independent of any other consideration.

White writers and analysts aren’t much better. All of them are illiberals, and all of them are committed to The Agenda. In NFL, The Agenda dictates blacks replacing whites at QB. Smith’s partner on FT is Skip Bayless, an aging white illiberal from Vanderbilt. He whined long and hard about D.C. drafting Kirk Cousins, because he thought it would make Griffin feel insecure. Why, though, if Griffin is the obvious number-one draft selection, as Bayless ceaselessly contended? Bayless’ yapping brought Griffin the national publicity he needed to win the Heisman over Andrew Luck, a decision that will look increasingly wrong as the years go by. Bayless insisted that though Luck was almost uniquely well prepared and ideally bodied and minded to be a champion QB, Griffin nevertheless had a higher ceiling. Two years in, Bayless looks increasingly silly and PC-Pollyannaish. Luck might well be on his way to becoming the best QB of all times. I believe that’s his destiny. Griffin is looking like a beat-up car. But for a very long time Bayless would simultaneously insist: 1) that Griffin The Third had the greatest upside ever… yet, 2) he was going to be unmade mentally by this white Big Ten backup the Skins took in the fourth round. If you’re a man who goes in for thinking, you might see a contradiction there. Even the not very bright but sassy Smith could see the Bayless wails were at odds.

Bayless’s doublethink shows that in their hidden parts, illiberals are as racist as anyone else. That means, when a racist and a self-described liberal look at a black, they both see the same thing. They just draw different conclusion from it. The lefist says to himself, I see that the black is inferior. I must, therefore, promote him and make excuses for him. Blame his failure on others. The racist (as the ‘liberal’ terms him) says: blacks are dumb and dangerous. We must protect civilized society from them. ‘Racism,’ as the educated know, is simply a dirty name for a clean thing. It’s an epithet coined by an anti-white communist, Trotsky the jew, who wanted to open civilized white societies to jewish predation. Since illiberals in the vein and manner of Trotsky control the mass media, their terms rule. In sports, that means you can say that blacks are faster than whites, no problem. You’re just being honest. But if you say that whites are smarter than blacks, which is just as true, then you are being hateful and racist. And you lose your job. The truth is and has been and will remain that fast thinking is more important than fast feet in determining the success of a professional quarterback. And the ability to think quickly and clearly is not evenly distributed across races.

I’ll summarize by saying that it was clear to anyone watching First Take that no matter what his mouth said, Skip Bayless’ brain doesn’t believe that Robert Griffin The Third can win an open and fair competition with Kirk Cousins. He’s probably right about that. As a racist, I don’t feel confident saying for sure that Cousins would beat out Griffin. I think he would. But it would be close. And I might be wrong. I just want to see a fair competition.

As an aside, you reading this, unless you’re in your nineties, have never lived in a world in which the mass media don’t make excuses for blacks. Ponder the significance of that statement for a moment. . . .How much we’ve had to sacrifice intellectually and socially to fabricate the myth of racial equality. Kirk Cousins’ personal contribution to the myth is not being allowed to compete for a job. Feeling the need to mouth in public for the cameras that the position and team belong to his competitor. How unnatural and wrong.

The NFL is presented as the ultimate meritocracy. It’s not. Far from it. By its very nature, with a very limited number of games — only 256 a season — it can’t be. There simply isn’t enough time to establish valuations anywhere close to completely accurate. Even leaving race aside, the decisions about whom to draft and to play must inevitably be guesswork, however educated. Given that there’s a very limited shelf life for even the best players, it’s simply inevitable that much sweetness is bound to be wasted on the desert air, as the poet had it. Well, that’s life in the big city. But the racial discrimination, in the NFL, is man-made. It doesn’t have to be. But even though it’s not acknowledged by ‘reporters,’ it does exist. And it hurts whites. Not one media analyst working for ESPN or any other major outlet will say that. Yet dozens of colored and uncolored analysts will leap to Robert Griffin’s racial defense when he is benched after a 3-10 start. Think about that. Who advocates for Cousins? And his kind? Who’s looking out for their white interests? Why do we believe, in 2014, that white interests isn’t even a thing? When every other race and the mass media are chock full of open hatred for our kind?

Nick Foles’s career was delayed, by at least a year, in my estimation, because of anti-white racial discrimination. Kirk Cousins’ career risks being snuffed by it. The same is true for many other players. Go read the poem at the last link…and think about it. Life is short enough – a professional football life is much shorter. I like football. I want to watch superior white players, not inferior black ones. I don’t think the game should be cut to fit the anti-white political agenda of ESPN jews…

To get back to our story, SAS was laughing out of the other side of his mouth when Foles went astronomical after that early weak performance at home against Dallas. Three weeks after the game that gave “Stephen A” so much merriment, not even the blackest tool in the shed could maintain Vick should be let out of his kennel. The pretense was kept that Vick was injured, even after he healed. It was a way to save face. For the media embrace the Brezhnev doctrine in matters racial: what’s black is black; what’s white is up for grabs. When blacks claim a QB position, it’s lost to whites for all time. That’s how the coloreds and their backing jews would have it. But it didn’t matter. Foles was simply too good. Not to mention, he’s younger, smarter, more talented than Vick. He reads defenses. He doesn’t turn the ball over. He just throws TD passes. To white receivers like

Indeed, that was another untold story – the sudden flourishing of white receivers in Philadelphia when a white QB replaced a black one. For a racist onlooker, what a delight. The media gnawed their tongues for pain. Not much you can say about putting the black back in when a superior white QB records only the second perfect QB rating in a game in NFL history, as Foles did in Week Nine, throwing a record-tying seven TD passes without an interception.

Foles became a star somewhere midseason. The media didn’t have to like it, but they had to accept it. They’d spent weeks anticipating Vick’s return. But eventually they had to yield. They spent weeks claiming that Foles was unfit for Kelly’s uptempo offense. But Foles’s performance proved them wrong. The media said Vick was the better choice to run Kelly’s uptempo, zone-read offense because it requires great footspeed. But it doesn’t. It requires great reads. Which requires great mindspeed – the quick perception of what the defense is doing and the ability to exploit it. It doesn’t particularly matter whether the Qb is the one running the ball – the QB’s main responsibility is to make the right read. In fact, it’s better if the QB doesn’t carry the ball because it lessens the risk of injury at the most important position.

The media are perfectly capable of seeing this. They just refuse to. For purely political reasons. It runs against their anti-white agenda. If they want Vick, then in their mouths and under their pens it becomes The Truth that Vick’s qualities are what Kelly’s system needs to thrive. No matter what the facts are. No matter what Kelly himself says. Of course, the media never acknowledge what they’re about. But it’s easy to see what they’re up to if you don’t share their bias. Foles is slower than Vick. True. All QBs are. He’s the fastest QB ever. So Foles runs less. That’s a good thing. He’s better at reading defenses in his first season than Vick ever was in any season. That’s because he’s smarter than Vick. The media love to promote faster black foot speed but never mention the more important slower black brain speed. That slow brain speed is the reason blacks have never been successful, with a few notable exceptions, playing quarterback. It just can’t be mentioned on tv because, you know, political correctness. But any time you hear about a QB’s inability to read defenses, you’re hearing a coded way of saying underbrained black. There are plenty of dumb white QBs who fail for the same reason most black QBs do. It’s just that intelligence isn’t equally distributed among races.

The tacit but guiding rule, which operates across all spheres, not just sports, runs like this:

The running argument was never anything more than a pretext for trying to advance a black QB over a white one. Facts never, never get in the way of The Agenda. Not in crime reporting, not in NFL QB analysis. Don’t ever kid yourself that anything in the US is played straight. If a jew owns the outlet, you’re not getting the straight scoop. Ever. As the queen said about sex, the truth is too good for the common white reader. It’s reserved for the jew to know in private. You? You are a subject only; fit for manipulation, not respect. You’re there to be the butt and the tool. To supply the owning, dominating jews with shekels. So keep paying that monthly cable tv bill (what is it now, $150? 200?), keep buying that sports laundry, keep reupping for those seat licenses (lol!) and season tickets. Keep making the Richmans richer.

* * *

Meanwhile, down in Washington, Kirk Cousins never had a chance. The jew owner Daniel Snyder dumped millions on his black hero from Baylor. This guy was going to save the franchise, which has been in the dumps for more than a decade. Snyder wasn’t going to give the white man a chance to beat out the black. Not when he paid him 21 million and gave away multiple first-round draft picks. Not for some fourth-rounder.

The media bowed before the man they called “Robert Griffin The Third.” Never merely Griffin, like any other person. Always the full thing. Like the negro was some kind of king in waiting. Oh my gosh, a black man who knows who his father is. You don’t see that every day. Let us worship him, like “King” Lebron James in the NBA. They ignored the white QB Cousins. He made one appearance on the Dan Patrick Show that I heard, and proved himself remarkably articulate and intelligent for a college kid. Very quick on the uptake. Good-looking and personable. A leader. Someone anyone would see as a good representative for his organization, or a good date for his daughter. Knows the right thing to say, and is funny too. But deferential and mildly PC in the way all whites are supposed to be these days, lest they appear uppity. His job is to sit on the bench behind the black hero. To affirm to the media that, if he gets the chance to play, still he knows this is Griffin’s team. He said as much the rare times he got in. Even though he performed better than or as well as Griffin. You have to wonder at his real thoughts… Nah. Anyone in his position would think he could win the starting job if given the chance.

Griffin was taken second overall in the draft. Cousins was taken in the fourth round. But here’s a fun fact. You know that guy Nick Foles I wrote about above? The guy who succeeded beyond wild expectations in Philadelphia? Kirk Cousins beat him out at Michigan State. That’s right. Foles left for Arizona because he couldn’t get on the field. Does that tell you something about Cousins’ potential? It ought to. But jew billionaire owner wants what jew billionaire owner wants. And that is black players. Black players who will pal around with him. (It’s not just incompetent black QBs jew Snyder likes. He has an incompetent black PR flack too. Even the illiberals at Gawker’s Deadspin hate him.)

It’s not the first time we’ve seen this from owner jews. The late jew Al Davis was the same way. (What? You didn’t think someone named Davis could be a jew? Wait till I tell you about Green and Ross…) But when you pal around with some players, and don’t give others a chance, you build resentment. Griffin seems to have developed an attitude. That’s ok when you’re winning. Griffin’s first season went well. He put the team in the playoffs. He produced a lot of scores. But he did it with dangerous running. As with Vick, it resulted in his being injured – very seriously. His second major injury in the last couple years. He refused to come out of the playoff game. The coach said ok and left him in. The Redskins lost. They might have won if Cousins had been put in earlier, in the first half, when it first became apparent Griffin was seriously hampered. These are not easy calls. There’s no need to second guess. But that’s what the media do.

Griffin spent all off-season rehabbing. He didn’t participate in all the usual drills. This would be used to excuse his poor performance in year two.

As the much anticipated 2013 Redskins season fell apart, what emerged down the stretch, amid media hatred of Shanahan, was that the two-time Super Bowl-winning coach had actually wanted to draft Ryan Tannehill, who ended up in Miami, rather than Griffin. So that meant it was, most likely, Shanahan behind the drafting of Cousins. He liked Cousins because he ran a pro-set offense at Michigan State. Whereas Griffin led a spread offense at Baylor. That means Griffin had a lot more to learn than Cousins, coming in. It means, had he been given the chance, Cousins could well have beaten out Griffin – or at least started until Griffin were up to speed. But Cousins never got that chance because the owner wanted his big-paycheck man and personal friend to play. The owner and the coach were at odds, and the owner always trumps the coach, who is his employee. And of course the media were all pushing Griffin. This little internal dispute and problem always existed, but it was under wraps until 2013, because the 2012 season went well.

If every fact I cited were race-reversed, the media would have been all over Shanahan to give the black fourth-rounder a shot. And screamed racism if he didn’t. They would have emphasized what I mentioned above – the difference in scheme experience, the black’s being farther down the learning curve than the white having to learn a new system. Let the (black QB) play while the (white QB) learns from the bench, they would have advised. Tom Brady was a sixth-round pick! they would have said. But since the big-name pick was black, all that stuff goes by the boards. It seeps out years later when the black QB suddenly isn’t doing so well. The media ‘analysts’ are just politicians by another name. They don’t believe a considerable amount of what they say, particularly where race comes into play. Only those on the outside with no career or money at stake can state the easily documented proof.

I would guess that if Coach Shanahan had his way, he would have opened up the QB position to competition. And I suspect he would have found Cousins winning that competition. I found this:

That’s a black columnist in a Washington Post blog column saying that. Here.

Was the jew owner forcing the white coach to play the inferior black QB ahead of the superior white QB? It sure looks like that might be the case. Shanahan is now gone, fired by jew Snyder, so we’ll have to wait for a tell-all book that will probably never come. Even though the white head coach waited until the lousy black QB had completely lost the season, he was still called

by media analysts when he finally substituted the white backup. You just can’t win. Either you fall in line with the anti-white agenda, or you endure taunting abuse.

* * *

The media always have and always will, so long as they are owned and managed by jews, run interference for the Vicks and Griffins. Why? Politics. QB is the most political position in sports. The most visible, the most powerful. Hence, it can’t be ignored by the powers that be. They want people preaching The Company Line in that position. That means speaking out against racism. Supporting diversity. Loving queers. You know how it goes. In the other football, in Europe, the sport is completely communized. Slogans exactly the same as you’d see in the old Soviet Union are visible before, during and after the games at the field. On the field. In the advertisements. In special commercials, the top football stars such as Cristiano Ronaldo speak out against racism. Players literally read statements against racism through a field microphone to the spectators before each and every World Cup game. Merely by playing professional soccer you are gang-pressed into a political position you might not support.

Typical banner, from a 2010 World Cup match between Ghana and Uruguay

If you’re a nationalist making any one of a number of gestures or shouting any one of a number of slogans, you risk prosecution. Euro-football is a totally politicized game.

American football isn’t that bad, formally. The problem is more informal. It just so happens that everything the league says and does, and everything that come out of the media covering it, is politically correct. But there are formal elements. The Rooney Rule, for instances. All teams must interview at least one ‘minority’ candidate before hiring a new coach. When it comes to QB — by far, the most important position on the field — there’s a tacit agreement through the league to practice affirmative action – racial discrimination against white QBs and in favor of blacks. Wherever possible, give the black coach or QB a little extra help.

* * *

The first year, 2012, things went well for Griffin. He played well. He broke rookie records. He got the team to the playoffs. But he ran a lot. He put himself at risk. He’s not short or small, really, but he’s not thick, either. He has muscles, but not much padding to absorb blows. Worse, he lacked the instinct for getting down or out of bounds when collision neared. NFL players are much faster than college players. That’s the biggest difference newcomers always discover. Defenses love to smash QBs when they get the chance. Griffin gave them chance. Sooner or later running QBs always pay the price. With Griffin, it was sooner. He couldn’t make it through even one year without getting injured, eventually requiring his second major knee operation. Badly gimping in the playoff game, he refused to let Shanahan yank him. This became a big debate.

If Shanahan had replaced him with Cousins earlier than he did, late first half instead of late second half, there’s a good chance D.C. would have won the game. But Griffin didn’t want to come out. It’s the coach’s responsibility to make that decision, the media said. But of course if Shanahan hadn’t yielded to Griffin’s insistence on staying in, the media would have blamed him for not giving the black QB a chance to overcome his injury and lead the team to victory. You can’t win if you’re Shanahan. Old white guy vs young black hero, the media will side with the latter every time.

In year two of the Griffin Dynasty, D.C. disintegrated. Expected by some to contend for the Super Bowl, the Redskins ended up in last place in their division, with a 3-13 record. Nobody expected this. The disaster of a season let to great recriminations in the second half, culminating in the firing of Mike Shanahan.

Stung by criticism he left the QB in too long in the 2012 playoff game, Shanahan didn’t let Griffin play a down in the 2013 preseason. He saved him for game one – and got blown out. What was the problem? Hard to say. Fans kept giving the black QB leeway. First it was two games. Then four. Then eight he needed to get back in the swing. Then the season was over. Griffin never got anywhere near last year’s form. Why?

Not clear, but speculation is that Griffin never fully recovered from his 2012 injury. Or that he did fully recover, but lost his footwork somewhere along the way, due to lack of practice or fear of getting reinjured. And his accuracy was significantly worse. Possibly his running speed too. The excuse was proffered that he’d missed training camp drills during the off-season because he was in rehab. For whatever reason, the Griffin of season one was gone. The Griffin of season two was a much worse runner and passer.

Griffin, remember, came out of a spread offense at Baylor. He had a longer learning curve for Shanahan’s system than Cousins would, since they play pro-set at Michigan. Some of the difference can be made up by altering the playbook, and calling stuff Griffin is used to. But after the injury, it makes sense to limit QB runs. If a QB goes from a runner in a spread offense to a typical pocket passer, he needs to be as accurate as the old-fashioned, slow, white dinosaurs: you know, the quarterbacks of yesterday rather than of the future. But like most running black QBs, Griffin wasn’t that accurate. Even though he had been in year one. When your QB can’t run anymore and throws inaccurately, the result is losses. And that’s what happened. All that’s left is to argue over the why. Most fans liked what Griffin did in 2012 well enough to give him one more year to rebound. If he doesn’t play near the level of 2012, even the black-loving lefty fans of D.C. will lose faith. 2013 was simply horrible. The difference is that far longer than the fan base of any other city, the fans of D.C. refrained from calling for Griffin to be benched for Cousins. Anywhere else, there would have been grumbles after week two, and loud yelling after week four. But D.C. didn’t make much noise till the end of the season. When Shanahan decided to sit injured Griffin down for the last three games in a lost season, just as many fans were critical of him as were saying “It’s about time.”

What’s the point? Contrary to what the media claim, black QBs are given more time than white QBs to prove themselves. Contrast the treatment accorded Tim Tebow with that accorded Robert Griffin III. Tebow took a team in a tailspin to the playoffs that same year, and got to the second round. After that, he was fired, traded, and then out of the league. Yes, he took a team to the playoffs in his first full year – and then couldn’t get another starting job! Unprecedented. Imagine the outcry if he were a loved and protected black rather than a hated christian white. The media would have screamed Tebow’s case to the skies until he was given a starting QB job. Griffin plays poorly an entire season, but most of the blame is heaped on his white head coach. That’s the racial reality of the NFL and its coverage. It goes unmentioned, but it’s all too real.

You should notice that the media never like to hold blacks responsible for anything, whether they’re murdering people on the street, or playing lousy football. If they murder someone, the gun gets the blame. If they fail tests, the school gets the blame. If they fail at QB, the coach gets the blame. Always something or someone else responsible for their inadequacies. Shanahan never gets any credit for what Griffin does right, but he gets nearly all the blame for what Griffin does wrong. This is ridiculous. It is also sportsmedia normal.

Shanahan — or any white coach — the yappers and typists can attack with impunity. You would think the fact he coached two Super Bowl victories would shield him. Nope. That was all Elway. He was just along for the ride. Or maybe it’s his kid, Kyle. That’s nepotism, hiring your kid to run the offense. But when Cousins finally came in for Griffin in the last three games, all of a sudden the offense ran fine.

The media and fans became vicious in their insults. Shanahan was a red-faced bastard. This was an odd feature of the criticism. Shanahan has oddly reddish and leathery skin. And he coached the Redskins. Which name itself was, of course, remains the center of a media-generated pseudo-controversy. Yet the white coach was attacked quite personally for his literal skin color. One can only shake one’s head. Meanwhile, the jewish owner was widely hated. But never attacked for being a jew. Even though his behavior hurt the team and fit a time-honored pattern of jewish anti-whiteism.

As I said above, what finally transpired was that jew Snyder really liked palling around with certain black players. The ones he bought for tens of millions of dollars. First, LaVar Arrington, then Albert Haynesworth. Then Robert Griffin. Just like Al Davis used to do. The late Davis was probably the first great promoter of the black QB. It didn’t work well for him, but he never stopped. Ideology that led him to sign JaMarcus Russell may have hurt his team, but it made for good politics, by the leftist-jew way of doing things.

The problem with hanging out with players is it builds resentment in others when they see certain people get favored treatement. Griffin was one of those players:

Black players generally feel the same racial loyalty black media do (many or most of the blacks in sports media are former players), but careers in the NFL are short and the money, unlike in other sports, isn’t guaranteed. They have to produce to get paid. They get paid based in large part on their numbers. If the QB can’t get them the ball, it hurts their income. If the QB can get them the ball, they don’t care if he’s white. They prefer a black QB, of course, but in the end, they want to get paid, yo, and if the white QB can put them in position to make stats better than the black guy, their loyalty only goes so far.

After one game it was reported that no lineman helped Griffin up after he got sacked. Poor line play was the reason Griffin took many sacks, but he too was responsible for some of them. Yet he didn’t seem to acknowledge that in his press conferences. He seemed to blame coaches or teammates, resulting in some private hostility. Even the jews at ESPN came around to saying that Griffin was a victim of his own swagger. Kirk Cousins showed how the QB is supposed to do it, at the press conference after his first start.

And, oh!, what about this interesting nugget, re Griffin’s playoff injury in 2012:

If blacks were held responsible for their behavior, that would be a damning quote. But they’re not. This nugget is precisely the kind of thing that is heard and could publicly be noticed by a sports media analyst but never is – because of the racial agenda. You have to look around on the Internet to find it. The media powers that be just ignore it and go on blasting the (two-time Super Bowl winner) dirty old racist redskinned head coach white guy.

2013 Griffin wasn’t doing a good job leading or playing QB. Nor were the media giving him his “fair share of abuse” (Rolling Stones). Griffin, though, is not your average black. He comes from an intact family with a military background. He’s married to a white woman. Some blacks see him as a cornball brother (see definition 5). One ESPN analyst got suspended for saying so. He has tweeted about America being overcome by Political Correctness, suggesting an ordinary conservative mindset in a very dark-skinned negro with cornrows. Griffin in some ways does seems whiter than black in his mindset and behavior. That might even extend to his personality flaws. He’s not obnoxious or stupid in the way many blacks are. But he definitely exhibits some unattractive, unhelpful passive-aggressiveness towards others. That’s not precisely a white thing, but it’s certainly far from the average perturbed-black thing – profanity leading to violence.

Griffin was a little too free in hinting that others, not he, bore the burden of the Redskins’ terrible performance in 2013. He at least hinted that the coaching staff and his line are the reasons the team has done poorly. That’s not how the QB is supposed to act. He’s supposed to lead, and take the blame himself, since he’s the leader. Let the analysts break down the problems at a more granular level.

Griffin was the beneficiary not only of a huge rookie contract but of endless undue hype from ESPN and numerous commercial opportunities — all before he’d ever played a snap. That could go to anyone’s head. It’s even speculated that his post-injury Adidas “all in for week 1” campaign might have pushed him back onto the field before he was fully recovered. That would be particularly ironic in retrospect. But this is how things are these days.

Studies have shown that young black men have higher self-esteem than any other group. Their esteem may be akin to the smile of the retard, but it has real-world consequences. To that self-adulation add hype from draft ‘experts’ like jew Mel Kiper and endless puffing from white illiberals like Skip Bayless. Top it off with international apparel companies and fast-food chains throwing millions of bucks your way to wear and eat their products. Imagine how hard it would be to keep from thinking you’re God’s gift to football, even if you were unusually controlled and level-headed for your race. It could be real, real easy not to believe that you were the source of any of your problems, since everyone’s blowing smoke up your ass about your greatness. But the NFL is a tough league. It takes some doing to be a top QB. Griffin is surely aware of this after his second season. Whether he can recover full mobility and speed and get his accuracy back remains to be seen.

It became clear to observers and teammates that Griffin was getting special treatment. Maybe not a lot, but some. It was time to give Cousins a chance. Past time, actually. Cousins probably should have started the season, in retrospect. I’ve always believed that if Cousins had started the season, D.C. would have made the playoffs.

The three games Cousins did start at the end of the year tempered my enthusiasm for Cousins, but only a little. I mean, you can’t sit the whole season and not expect to be rusty when you finally do get in. Cousins played well enough that I would take a chance on him, if I were a GM. He proved he can execute the offense and move the ball down the field. He did bad things too. Just a matter of whether those bad things – off-target throws leading to interceptions – would decrease with experience. I see no reason not to give him the benefit of the doubt. The Skins were terrible. Fumbling the ball all the time, not blocking, lousy defense – just all-around terrible play.

But we’ll see.

What does 2014 hold for this most interesting racial competition, however undeclared and unallowed?

I suspect the Skins will not trade Cousins, though I hope they do. I wouldn’t if I were them. There is no guarantee the 2012 Griffin will reappear. It didn’t all 2013. You get leg injuries, you lose speed. Without the running, you need accuracy. Griffin supporters assure themselves Griffin’s 2012 accuracy and/or his leg speed will return. I wouldn’t bet on it myself. In 2014, if the wins aren’t there, the leash will be much shorter. Cousins or someone else will get a more meaningful shot. I’d prefer to see Cousins traded and get a chance to start somewhere else, because I think jew Snyder won’t give up on Griffin for at least two more seasons, and that’s too long for Cousins to waste away on the bench. It’s not like there are dozens of great QBs in the NFL. There are only about fifteen that are first- or second-tier. Cousins is worth a shot somewhere. Many somewheres, in fact.

If Griffin fails, the media will just move on to the next great black hope. They promoted Teddy Bridgewater of Louisville as their number-one black QB prospect all 2013, and he’s nowhere near as good as they make out. It never ends, and it all conduces to the same end, and pursues the same agenda. Even if the hyped black QB fails, he still got opportunities a white QB did not. Even if he fails, there’s always another dark guy in place to get pushed ahead of the competition by jewsmedia tailwind.

The big-time media lie about everything. Here’s a great example. Don’t think for a moment they won’t lie about racial QB differences as readily as they lied about WMD in Iraq. If you know their agenda, though, you can see through their lies. You can see them coming before they’re even concocted.

I’ll be writing on the NFL regularly in the 2014 season. //

By Alex Linder

/ message
edit note

By Alex Linder

Green niggers is a nice way to put it. As a “former” Green Nigger I put it right up with your appellation of “badge fag.”

Where did the worship of these useless at best, actively criminal at minimum, people come from?

The state. All its institutions brainwash freemen to think that Holy Government provides ‘needed’ services; without it, we’d be bereft. We’d all starve to death. Everyone who works for the government is a ‘hero’ who is ‘underpaid,’ whether she’s a teacher, cop, fireman or marine.

The state and its handmaiden media join forces in the production of this ubiquitous white and black stereotype:

1) noble, selfless, underpaid public servants;

2) evil greedy selfish private businessmen.

All in order to distract the goydolt from the bottom line: the government makes its money the same way the thief does: by taking it at gunpoint. The businessman has to serve someone to get paid. The businessman is the public servant; the government thug is the greedy bastard. The businessman the good guy, and the thief the bad guy – if you accept traditional morality, which considers theft to be wrong. Most people do. So it becomes the job of the state, through its schools and its FCC-licensed presstitutes, to obscure this underlying moral difference between rape and consensual activity. The tyrants aren’t even satisfied with moral equivalence. They demand a complete reversal – just as they do on race, you’ll notice. The rapist becomes the good guy, in their institutions and media. The economic partner becomes the bad guy. Again, perfect parallel to the way race is played.

How do the mass media, which we know are owned by anti-white jews, stereotype businessmen? Do you deny thusly?: They only care about making profits. They are overpaid. They have easy access to an endless stream of capital to carry out their nefarious plans. Ignored is the fact that most businesses fail within five years – because actually serving people is HARD, not easy. Most people live in an ego cloud. Have you noticed that? They pay no attention to others. It’s all about what they want and need. Businessmen have to come out of that cloud. They have to pay attention to people. Take them seriously. Listen to what they want and need. Supply it. You know, one definition of love is taking someone seriously. Businessmen do that. Government agencies do not. They are so not about caring for people that the DMV uncaring idiot is a comedy staple. That an anti-government trope could be normalized is more impressive than a guy head-butting his way through fifteen bricks, because that’s how strong the pro-government screen through which the mass media are filtered actually is.

Unlike private businesses, government agencies never fail, they only expand. Until the whole government collapses. After decades of stealing from honest, competent, successful men to feed greedy, tyrannical parasites. No one has any right to speak of ‘public service’ or ‘customers’ when the government retains a monopoly, forbids competition, and blatantly pisses off its forced-user base without EVER suffering any consequences for it.

The same media that make the nigger out to be the good guy lionize the government parasite. Too many WN haven’t figured this out. Giant, centralized bureaucracy is not the white man’s friend, it is his enemy. A man who needs central government for anything but collective defense has no right to call himself a white man, as he is no different from a Detroit nigger. Even if no jews or minorities existed, giant, centralized bureaucracies staffed wholly with whites would serve the worst elements in our race and exercise a very real dysgenic effect.

In 1900, the US was solvent. Was in great shape. And the federal government was comparatively tiny. Now look at it: the opposite. A gigantic, centralized bureaucratic monster has been created that eats white men to sustain itself, and does nothing but damage wherever its feet or tail hit the ground. The USA was sovereign and respected – then. Now it’s 17 trillion in hock, and hated around the globe. Jews + giant, centralized state have really worked out well for us, haven’t they?

What’s remarkable and very sad is that many racialists can’t see through the pro-government propaganda the way they can the racial propaganda. I’m asking you power-eagle fans to think about it. Is an institution that overtly discriminates against whites likely to be white-positive in other ways? Do you really believe the anti-white policy of affirmative action and general disrespect are the exception to the rule? Or is anti-whiteism in the very warp and weave of centralized government?

I’m telling you it’s all of a piece. Whites don’t need centralized government. Centralized government knows that. Centralized government needs whites! To supply the taxes it can redistribute to empower itself and the kind of creatures it favors – leftists, jews, ‘minorities,’ sexual deviants – defectives of a thousand sundry quirks. It’s the motley crew of subsidized semites and sickos against normal whites. That’s all. What I’m saying to you is that THE ENTIRE THING is against our racial interests, not just the overtly anti-white discrimination part. The DEA is anti-white. The Department of Education is anti-White. The DOD is obviously anti-White. So is every other department. Every single one.

Whites can handle their business. It’s almost what defines them, with a nod to Asian competence. That’s why decentralization is the only genuinely white political form. The other races need central dictatorship to make their decisions for them. Centralization is necessary for niggers, as they’re retarded. It’s a necessary tool for jews, who require it to manage a hostile, alien population, and yoke it to serve their tribal interests. But it’s useless for the white man apart from one purpose: defending his racial kind and community from hostile aliens. Collective defense is central government’s only legitimate function among white men. For the rest, he can devise private solutions.

Try it backward: If public school teachers (or cops, firemen, soldiers) were so great, would the jew-controlled mass media endlessly praise them? They wouldn’t. They praise them because they’re all part of a system, and that system is inherently and ineradicably anti-white. That is the basis on which our country was RE-established over the course of the 20th century. Government employees, witting or unwitting, are paid agents of the anti-whites who created the new system. They are ‘change agents’ who are to live well off the taxes on the unwilling while ushering in a new world order in which white nations have disappeared. Yes, you are forced at gunpoint to subsidize the creation of their anti-white utopia and the endless abuse and discrimination necessary to bring it about. This is tyranny, as Jefferson defined it.

The government feeds itself the same way all criminals do: by force. Private businesses feed themselves by persuading people, without the use of guns, to use their products or services. That is the fundamental difference between the two. The private sector actually serves the public; the public sector merely claims to. Again, it’s directly parallel to the racial reversal. Anyone should be able to see that.

The only service the government actually renders is to itself: entrenching and ensconcing itself, like Ted Kennedy in the back room of an expensive French restaurant, getting liquored up en route to raping a waitress. Always expanding. Always creating new problems so it can spread into new areas. Always denying its own responsibility for the problems it created or exacerbated. Always blaming the private sector for problems caused by its own regulations or operations.

Imagine if the government ran a pizza shop.

1) It would outlaw all other pizza shops.

2) It would be open from 9am to 4pm.

3) It would offer one topping: cheese.

4) It would jack up the price of cheese pizzas every six months.

5) The media would claim if it weren’t for the government, rural people and minorities wouldn’t have access to pizzas.

6) The media would advocate for Pizza Department expansion into cheeseburgers.

The natural and inevitable tendency is for all governments to evolve into East Germany.

White men need government?

Incorrect. Government needs white men. To feed on.

By Alex Linder

[ The following is from a forum thread posting. ]

Fair enough. I don’t see why people refer to that as “universalism” though.

It’s universalist because it says ALL MEN need its ONE TRUE PATH. Math/science are universal because the laws they uncover are in fact laws for all men, they are objectively and independently true. Christianity, the hapless hag that it is, has pretensions in the same direction – to universal validity. It just leaves out the whole evidence thing. What? Oh. It’s playing by special rules. Oh, ok. In fact, it’s just tennis with the net down, to use Frost’s phrase. Lots of non-science claims try to leech off the cachet of the real thing, in order to steal its prestige and obtain its respect and power. This is not honest. But all leftism follows this path. Global warming is one scam that masquerades as science. Christianity is another, even though it came first.

These are the the important facts:

1) Christianity’s central claim is not true.

2) No one needs christianity.

Are the Japanese not civilized? They aren’t christian. Nor are the Chinese. Nor are the pygmies in Africa. All of them happily live their own separate and different ways. They don’t need some fictional story about a kike to create viable societies. Shintoism, Buddhism, Confucianism – worked fine for them for 4,000 years, in case of the last.

Math is true. Christianity claims its claims are true. It can’t point to anything we would call evidence in any other circumstances to verify its claims. Rather, its claims are divine revelations. Thems kind don’t need no stinkin’ badges. You’re just to shut up and accept them. Southern man says, yessuh, ah will. Ah shorely and poorly will. By contrast, a man says, I got your evidence right here, you kike faggot fellating spiritual Q-RID sufferers. A white man laughs at what’s dumb and wrong and pretentious and dishonest. He doesn’t fall on his knees and fellate it. That is the difference. I’m not sure you can make it out, but that’s what it is. The law of gravity is real. The law that you need to accept Jesus as your personal savior or you go to hell is an unsubstantiated claim. Gravity is real. Whether you respect it, hate it, you’d best be advised to take it into account. Now, a thing like that is on a whole other order of seriousness and reality than some kike fairytale about a fictional fruitcake named jesus. But no, no, you can find high-IQ idiots by the boatload who claim that science and christianity are on par. True in different ways, by different standards. It is not so. Do not ever believe it. Jesus-our-savior is mere opinion. Don’t believe in Jesus, nothing changes, nothing ramifies. Don’t believe in gravity, well, go jump off a cliff and see what happens. There’s a difference there at least one in four Southerners might be able to make out, if he puzzle awhile over his cobbler. Rest assured, that one in four is me being charitable on this venerable holiday. (Insert Norman Fell Three’s Company grin here.) Or Phil Hartman’s acting-coach skit: This is something. This is nothing. Try to make out the difference. It doesn’t matter how many dresses you put on Big Wopper. Men mock. Women believe. Doubt is what turns Third World into First World. Faith is what turns First World into Third. Religion is the opposite of civilization.

Neither one of us knows what you’re saying. You begin by misunderstanding universalism and proceed into darkness with the confidence of a bat but without its sonar.

Yeah, ok. I’m wasting my time with you.

Look, you can’t think. And you can’t realize that, it’s above your level. Whatever wackiness drives you, the rest of us have to deal with the results. So your kind will be holding soup kitchens to pass out free food to hominid pigeons, i.e., niggers, drawing them to my area. Your kind will import Somalis and then call me a “hater” when those Somalis turn around and rape people. I’m the bad guy for talking about it. This is the insane world the lunatics of your cult have created, and I have to read on my own forum from dirt eaters about how this cult isn’t fundamentally and essentially destructive. It is.

People on your level love christianity precisely for the reason I’ve said: it’s thinking with the net down. That’s a game you’re qualified to play, unlike real tennis.

It’s you dirt eaters out there murdering the jew’s enemy. Serving in the jew’s army. If you were as smart as the average rejecter — or as principled — you wouldn’t be doing that. But you’re Southerners. One expects little. Little is what you’re capable of.

Southerners keep getting their ass kicked by more intelligent folk, but their solution is never to rework their culture to celebrate and promote thinking and organization, it’s more along the lines of the cows in the add: EAT MOR DIRT. How’s that working for you, Southern ‘man’?

As your attempted arguments show, you are what you eat.

Christianity is what PREVENTED whites from simply killing off their enemies. You fucking Southerners, anti-intellectual idiots, don’t make necessary distinctions, tho it trip you 1,000x running. Parallel between Patsy Decline and the church. If the jewsmedia attack Pattycake, why, he must be one of us. That make Southern sense to a man. If the fucking leftists northern elite book-reading bastards you hate say white religious Euro-invaders committed genocide against the native pee-pulls, why, that must be true, we jes’ don’t agree it’s a bad thing, since we’re WN, it’s a good thing. When are you idiots going to stop being idiots? Yeah, I know, the answer is never, but let’s pretend it’s “sometime!” just so I don’t cry myself to sleep. Pat Buchanan IS NOT ON OUR SIDE. And, the parallel, EUROPEAN IMMIGRANTS DID NOT GENOCIDE brownskin pee-pulls. They inadvertently killed many by new diseases, borne on germs they weren’t aware of, but all these white men were there to CONVERT the savages. To civilize them. To make them into good little christians. ALL THEIR RECORDS REFLECT THIS. But you fucking idiots don’t believe in words and ideas. They don’t really matter. Distinctions? What are those? Them sound kinda faggy? I’m going muddin! You are not humans in any serious sense, that’s why I call you dirt eaters. That reflects your true cultural level. Eating dirt out of jars. Unable to think like real men. Go worship in your church. It’s all your good for. Go die for Israel. It’s all you’re capable of. You’re not white men in any real sense, just skin color, like the liberals you serve say. White men don’t act like Southern ‘men.’ Southern culture is as far from white culture as it’s possible to get. Yeah, Boers, I see your raised hand and acknowledge your claims too. You may well be even dumber and more gullible, I can’t deny that. But we’re dealing with the South tonight.

Words mean nothing. Ideas mean nothing. It’s all just faggy intellectualism. Real men are Jim Giles or WISH they could be. A pinhead and a bonehead. A pone-head! They don’t sit around thinking. They’re either eatin’ dirt or swooshing around it in pickups, or off creeping through it with rifles to shoot somebody for Uncle Shmuel.

Who can respect this region? Who can admire the ‘men’ it produces? Christ, out of every 100 hominids, only two can read above a fifth-grade level. One of them is the lawyer who ran from his own words when some Purdue cunt hailed him on the honker; the other is Brad Griffin.

I don’t know whether to laugh, cry, shit or scream. Maybe all four at the same time?

What is a white man to do with this lot?

So this church that you dirt-eating spiritual queers just love and cry when I deride and by deride I mean describe accurately says AND HAS ALWAYS SAID we are ALL GOD’S CHILDREN. Christians have always believed that. Whether they believe one race was better than another or not. That underlying belief, that profound and unalterable doctrine, that rock-hard dogma, was always there and cannot be removed. Either way, whether you’re egalitarian or racist, the CHRISTIAN whiteskin man’s duty and burden remained to educate and civilize and convert the dusky heathen – to be the darky brother’s zookeeper, as the per-verse has it. That’s still what white men believe today, whether southern or northern christian. The northern socialist-atheists you deride are ALL products of an essentially christian mentality. Rejecting the imaginary christian god by pointing out its nonexistence doesn’t imply anything else. I understand this is too fine a point for you to grasp, but others might be able to. I deserve blame, too, though, come to think of it. I never should have gone along with the common parlance and called my position atheist. I should have come up with something better. So from now I’ll be a rejecter. That’s my position. I reject bogus claims, unevidenced claims, particularly those related to fictional entities. I use ‘rejecter’ to distinguish my position from the rejecters who go on to tie that single valid position to other political positions I don’t necessarily share.

See, now, Vince, your stupidity has actually helped me, so I thank you. I am being the change I seek in the world, and embodying my criticism of Southerners by showing them a different and superior culture to their own: I changed something in my ways because it was failing. I made an improvement. I puzzled out what it was I was doing wrong, and changed my behavior, in this case my un-thought-through choice of a term to describe a certain position I and others hold. I changed a failure pattern by studying evidence, hard, clear thought, willful decision, executive action. That’s how functional culture works. That’s the White way. It is the opposite of the Southern way. I deserve no praise, though. I never should have made the mistake in the first place. Me who prides himself on thinking, intellectualism, and above all his ability to see how words, particularly political frames, are used. But I missed this key one! Terrible job on my part. <--------------- Self criticism. Not Southern. White. White-cultural essence and necessity. No development without it. Without thought and correction, feedback from reality, white man is no better than non-white man. But not all white men are capable of white culture. Christianity serves that crowd. That's one thing. But what's not acceptable is that christ-insanity JUSTIFIES THAT CROWD. By lying to it that its childish faith is just as valid as adult thinking. It is not. Jews realize this. It's why they run things while whites run to fetch water for them.

You don’t understand what the thing is. The takeaway is that the parts in it that can’t be changed, the things that don’t move, are either anti-white or untrue (and sometimes both). The stuff that can change and move simply rides with Caesar – see the current pope pushing socialism and praising the niggers invading that Italian island, Lampedusa. But you Southerners will simply dig up any period in history when whites were doing better than today and claim it’s because of christianity. I have proved it’s not, but you can’t accept proof because you come from a culture that doesn’t believe in thinking. We’re fahtin’ men, we are. Jim Giles is you. A fisthead looking for a punchup. Not human in any genuine sense, but Southern through and through. I know something better than yours, and that’s why you’re here and I aint there. That goes for Southerners and Christians, and Christian Southerners. So fucking listen to me and learn something.

By Alex Linder

Ok…for those who can’t decode WASPing, I’ll cut, copy and explain. Using others’ demise to further our comedic and educational aims is the heart of everything high-minded WASPs DON’T stand for, but it’s also the dead frog-fucking center of everything I DO, so lets embark posthaste.

Such a wonderful spirit.

WASPs have no souls. They have spirits? They have spirits of accountants too gutless to embezzle. Maybe. I mean, I’d bet the other way there too, but I suppose it’s possible.

And of course, if you aren’t on their like list, then you’re mean-spirited. Not wrong. Deficient in some imaginary virtue ‘good’ people (their circle) possess. This is a chickenshit way of moving through the world, but it is their way. I am quite honest when I say the jewish way is preferable to the WASP way. It’s better to be an honest, down-to-earth criminal than whatever it is WASP elite think they are. Again, I’m not talking about Bob Parley in his rotten Ford with his ugly dog, I’m talking about the lacquered and breath-minted elite.

I cannot fathom that my sisterfriend Katherine is gone.

That isn’t tolerable. A rat would emete that shit. Your “sisterfriend”? Jesus Christ Risible.

Future times, in this beautiful life,

WASPs are OBSESSED with using words like HIGH and BEAUTY and SPIRIT (it’s a softer, perfumigated version of Lenin’s PC’s attempt to create a alternative reality via words) – really, all WASP culture is like Mary Baker Eddy + water. I know not even one percent of you will appreciate what I mean viscerally, but perhaps you can grasp it mentally: Mary Baker Eddy’s Science and Health is the WASP mentality raised to the highest degree, or ad nauseam, ad ridiculum, ad abstrusium. Ultimately, by this way of thinking you get to a language in which everything is abstract and, well, glides into and out of everything else, is perfectly transitive. All becomes one. It’s the most frustrating thing in the world to read and try to make sense of. Well, anyone with sense can make it for nonsense with a few minutes’ review, but you still might have to go to Sunday School for a good many years. Anyway, this high-minded gunk, for proper WASP elite are never anything else, creates a cultic atmosphere that is appealing to many or even most elite women, and far too many elite men. They create an atmosphere through their use of words, and a milieu through their actions and connections and institutions. If you don’t speak, act and think like they do, and there are very good reasons not to, they will discover you and ostracize you. They are the opposite of a relaxed, reality-based community; they are rather a cult of high-minded strivers and seekers who call what they do service. They do well by doing good, as they see it. They might say because.

we would have experienced together over the coming years, growing older, will never happen. Ideas and projects that we would have helped each other create have gone silent. I will miss her warmth, humor, and brilliance.

Gauche as a prole’s personal ad. The woman willingly spent her life studying and rising in a cult built on slitting animal throats as a way to propitiate the higher powers. Real friggin’ noble.

Future laughter and wit in duet now deflected or echoing alone. The only way forward is to tend to the special lights that she emitted, and kindled in others. We love you Katherine. Thank you Pomona College for being her professional home for so many years.

Hmm…I suspect her bioluminescence were due to fungal infection, perhaps contracted from one of the donkeys this bongo-whapper assassinated. One of the risks of the trade.

facilitate class discussion better than anyone I have ever had teach me

That’s a good compliment; she can be posthumously proud of that one. … How WASP of me. I included a positive remark to feign even-handedness. The real me thinks these students praising her class discussions liked her ditching of solid academic work for braindead femalical jibber-jabber.

She had the gift of completely validating and accepting a person for what they are while at the same time encouraging them to be better.

You are awesome, mmkay? But if you were awesome and bathed regularly…holy shit man…Has the chart got a position ABOVE number one??

Katherine deeply influenced my teaching. At a workshop for new faculty
at Pomona College ten years ago, Katherine had all of us sitting in a circle
playing different African drums, some loud and others quiet. We each had a rhythm
to play. Initially our drumming was a frantic mess. She showed us in a dramatic
fashion how important it is to leave the pauses between phrases empty, so that
the other drum voices could be heard. Whenever there is a pause in one of my
class discussions, I remember Katherine and resist the urge to fill the quiet
with my own voice. So often the voices of students that are not often heard come
forth at those moments. I am so thankful to Katherine for helping me to make
space for those voices.

That’s called antiphony, nigger! It’s damn good too, as the niggers do it, listen to a Farrakhan speech. Listen to a Goyfire.

Words cannot describe our collective loss.

Oh yes they can. Words can describe anything. For example, your bottom looks like a exploded beanbag chair collected in a discount shopping bag.

I still can’t wrap my mind around this.

I know, man. The bornin’ papers clearly stated everyone gets to live to 92 in perfect health, so what-t-f gives with dying at 52?? We need to appeal this to some federal coroners’ court.

Professor Hagedorn was a beautiful mind and a

There it is: the WASP’s highest of holies: a beautiful mind. That term is catnip to them, what they aspire to, what they award each other. Remember Barbarba Bush’s not troubling “my beautiful mind” with the horrors of (Afghanistan). I’ve never understood how a mind can be beautiful. The concept is non-cognizant, as the pretentious like to say. It is people who throw around garbage terms like this who are very often the practitioners of the lowest forms of scumbaggery, just as it is very often the people who proclaim their love of animals (another WASP stereotype) who are shittiest to actual humans. As a writer accurately summed up WASPS, they love dogs and hate people. The whole thing is just eddied Eddy: if we pretend bad things don’t exist, or anything/one we don’t like doesn’t exist, then it goes away. Reality is determined by us! Reality is a social construct. And they’ve done all they could to make it so. All cults are like this. Realitarians are hated and need not apply, and if admitted and discovered, given the order of the boot. My mom graduated from Pomona. She wanted one of her children to go there. I did. If Pomona had had inkling of my views, granted not as fully formed on entrance as exit, I would never have been admitted – and the Dean of Admissions more or less said this straight out in a hostile LTE back when I was Opinions Ed. at the student paper. This cult loves niggers and hates sniggers. Ah, who’m I kidding. I was the bad guy, and I loved it, just like Tony Montana. This cult gots money and power, but it also gots nothing. Big heaping scoops of pissant nothing.

There is only one term WASPs love more than ‘beautiful mind,’ and that is…enrichment. My college president, David Alexander, among the dead, who will figure in this thread, believe you me, was enamored of this word. If this word could have been animatronicized into a vinyl doll he would have left his wife for it. He could not write a speech, hell a paragraph in a speech without using it. I always thought it was a real tell to where his mind lay. It honestly came off to me, with ears to laugh at it, like a Dickens character or a Butler character (The Way of All Flesh, remember the College of Spiritual Pathology). Everything enriches us, but we never touch on money, altho Dollar is our God and Dollar is our every waking thought. WASP’s god is MONEY. He loves money like that ad dog loves BACON! But he can’t admit this directly, so he has to come up with useful terms such as enrichment like a sort of e’erlit verbal candle one might buy in one of those womeny smell ‘n’ cards Stores of Niceness. It’s enough to make a sane grown man chew on oleander, which is poisonous, for the arboreally disinclined among you.

helped me see music in a way that I’d never imagined it

Get a little suspicious at this sort of encomium, which is repeated through these letters. I suspect it might tinge into the political here, with them evaluating music by its ancestry rather than its, well, quality. A PC version of Twain’s wholly justified snipe on Wagner: It’s better than it sounds. I have a feeling that Guangian Throat Clearing fits that bill pretty neatly.

I remember every class period of Music 11

Geezus. No one remembers every class period of anything, even a seminar on Advanced Vampirology taught by Jebus himself. A phrase I can’t quite remember fits here; this just goes beyond necessary exaggeration.

Katherine taught me the value of my own musical story, that there was a connection between learning and meaning. She encouraged me to stay close to my roots and to let my work find me

Yeah, that was a tactful way of saying the oboe escaped you, my darling; lay back and await your mate and metier, the noble kazoo. Rooty-toot toot! Woot!

These are all so close in spirit as the queer waiter who said to my table, essaying the sensuous, “I’ll be right back with some warm bread and some cold water,” a phrase that sparkled me for decades. By these I mean, taught me the value of my own musical story; like a painting that needs to be explained. Dopey broad, if your music has value, it’s self-explanatory. Your burbling will hardly enrich it. she seemed to key into what each student cared about, even if we didn’t know it ourselves … That just verges on satire, makes the writer sound like a mind fit for Romper Room. Alt translation is this broad sucked after positive student evaluations, was afraid to kick students in the ass or send their tin ears to the recycling center. You can just see her handing this broad a triangle, “Here, this might be a little more your speed, mmkay?”

helped me see music in a way that I’d never imagined it. What I’ll remember most are her potlatch suppers, usually featuring African vegetarian dishes, often based on beans. When the inevitable gas leak occurred, she giggled and called it found music.

Jesus. You can’t make this stuff up. The she-Seinfeld of Grouse College.

Coming to terms with her loss—if this is even possible—will take us all a long time.

I feel like the girl in Vacation when Chevy Chase is painting the lily re the dead aunt.

the gift of music, the heart beating darkly. The topic was one thing, but what counted was the personal connection, the sense that thinking through music should be equal in complexity, vitality, and mystery to its subject

Really? Then why did she study third-world music? Has that species produced anything remotely as complex and nuanced as the white west? Isn’t that pounding beat characteristic of music at its lowest, with nothing but limbic lust to express?

Beautiful person, beautiful mind, beautiful spirit, beautifully put – I defy anyone to tell me this unwitting repetition of these locutions of high-mindedness as they think of it is not characteristic of a cult. Repeating its mantra. They honestly are not aware of what they’re doing, or how weird it is when you look at it objectively, or instinctively find it unappealing rather than appealing.

People these days are all about experiences, having them, collecting them, undergoing them, but it seems these seldom produce any interesting thoughts. A little in this world, any sector thereof, goes a very long way. If you know how to grind it up and make meal out of it.

Then at the bottom, from unrelated article ‘beautifully written style,’ jesus, it never ends with these people.

By Alex Linder

[ The following is from a forum thread posting. ]

Ok…this is a test. It is only a test. Remain seated, standing, piked, as you wish. No actual guinea pigs, Northern Portugese, moderators, silverfish or coelacanths will be harmed in the making of this post. I will not tell you what the test is about. It’s just a small private thing of interest to me. The less unintelligent among you can figure out what I’m after.

This thread is for your stories about Thanksgiving. Or your hopes, plans and dreams for this weekend. Horror stories or great stories, or stories of supreme indifference. What an odd term. Of all the odd couplings in language, you’d never think someone would hook up ‘supreme’ with ‘indifference.’ It doesn’t even make sense when you think about it. (Lofty works better, to my glorious ear.) So don’t. Just tell me your Thanksgiving story, if you have one.

Someone constructed a brilliant post at one of the Gawkers, it was an attack on vile food more or less related to this holiday. Most of its pick I heartily second, most notably green bean casserole and this horrid orange-potato mash topped with marshmallow dung. The devil would boot the latter out of hell for unnecessary roughness, as our football pals say. Trying to turn vegetables into dessert: what could be more christian-midwestern than that? I don’t know, maybe it’s a Southern thing too or actually or originally, but in any case it’s up here for good.

Jezebel has its usual tell-us-your-Thanksgiving-horror-story thread, which always devolves into hate-your-relatives bitchfest. I posted this, since they’re looking for negs:

CatFiveHimmicaneU

One time…long ago…it was Thanksgiving in Maryland, and everywhere else too. It was raining, raining hard. My dad and I drove about 40 miles to a Denny’s. We had sad racetrack turkey slices with mashedish potatoes and congealed greenish gravy. It was a sad, rainy Thanksgiving.

The truth is, although it was superficially miserable, and god only knows why we did an 80-mile roundtripper, I guess out of some sense of dull supposed-to, as whites seem to do most things these days, I somewhat enjoyed the lugubriousness of it all. That cold November rain, though, that can be the most depressing thing on earth. November is the month of death. December is the month of “Gentlemen, start your engines!,” what with the solstice. I love the very last days of December, when you just get a little change in the sun. Like it starts trying again. When it finally turns over. All downhill from there. But late November is as woegegone-dreggy as it gets.

Ok, now for some stomachwarming stuff.

I always liked cranberries. As Fortuna would have it, life afforded me the rare opportunity, some years back, to stay a few days in Massachusetts, with some people with a little land. On their land they had an actual cranberry bog. I spent some time communing with the tiny orbs, really getting to know them. Getting a feel for what they’ve been through as a people. Their successes, their travails, their complaints about working conditions. Generally I found them a happyish lot. No one living in Massachusetts under feet of water can be completely happy as, say, a mite on a liquor vine in Napa, California, but all things considered, their chowder wasn’t going unclammed. Anyway, this amateur cultural fruitologist would say that cranberries are a weird northern vegetable that grow in a sort of lagoon. Precisely the type of thing you wouldn’t step in if it were in La. or Fla. for fear of alligators. They are a kind of underwater berry, creepy in the “Last Dance with Mary Jane” video sense. But boy do they taste great when combined with lots of the poison called refined sugar, altho I, for one, never noticed it behaving any more politely than brown sugar. One of my treasured memories from early VNN is having the chance to credit the great thinker, the white rural genius, who came up with a better machine for harvesting cranberries. Some farmer guy, as I recall. [Ah, here it is.] I love the idea of some white guy just mulling this over for years, and finally hitting on the right solution, which apparently is a means of shaking the underwater bushes so that the berries float to the top, where they are sucked into the metallical maw of BIG CRANBERRY, as Drew Magary would call it.

But now…my story here was, like a child looking at things adult, I always thought there was some sort of magical culinary power required to create cranberries-the-dish. I truly thought it was like some master chef preparation requiring actual gifts and esoteric knowledge. Sometimes it’s more fun to let things remain magical, rather than science them open and find the same old squashed squirrel. Nevertheless, if you want cranberries, and no one’s going to bring them to you, and they’re not going to magically appear, you have to make them. So I looked up a recipe. Turns out I was completely wrong. Cranberries are as easy to make as instant coffee. I was a little sad yet thrilled at the same time. Kind of like having sex for the first time. Homer Simpson wasn’t kidding when he said that bit about food preparation. When you’re a kid, cranberries appear once a year, magically, and ravish you. Just as suddenly they whisk away again, disappearing who knows where for another twelvemonth. Something is gained and lost when we transition from child to adult, from magic to knowledge. The lighter and finer yields to the deeper and stabler, I guess. It’s still sadsome though. Cranberries are sweet with pain, like all good things and great changes in life. Birth, death, knife fights.

C-berries require: 1 cup of orange juice. 1 cup of white sugar. Heat up the orange juice in a pan, stir in the sugar. Then add 12 oz or 16 oz of cranberries. Heat them up till they pop. Watch or they’ll burn over the side! When they start popping, which doesn’t take long, turn off the heat. Pour the pan into a bowl. Let them set. In the spirit of our Puritan ancestors, let them sit in the bowl, cool their round heels, and Think About What They’ve Done. The confining bowl will serve as the Correctional Institute for Hot Berries. There’s a reason they’re in between the color of whore’s lipstick and deep embarrassment. All cranberries should be fried in orange juice daily, to twist the old joke: if you don’t know why, THEY DO. Cranberries do remind me of the lips of a beautiful woman, discreet and whorish at the same time, like all the best ones are. Their color is second only in beauty to peacock’s-neck blue, I would judge it.

That is the it and the all of making delicious cranberries, one of the tartest and tastiest dishes on planets earth and Mars. One of the most beautifully colored too, as, in the words of a successful restaurant owner, “We eat with our eyes, not just our mouth.”

If you walk into a Hy-Vee you can pay around $4 for a name-brand bag of, say, Dole cranberries. Whereas, if you go into economical German-thoroughthunk Aldi, you can pay, as I did the other day, 79c for a 12oz bag! Now THAT is a great price.

I hope you have something good to eat, watch, read, talk to and sleep on this Thanksgiving. As for me, I’m going to eat cranberries till I puke, do some shadowboxing, then eat some more.

Here’s an exciting holiday song to lift your spirits. It’s by the Divinyls, and its very jittery, which is how I feel when a jag’s coming on, when the muse is blowing fecund.

By Alex Linder

[The following is taken from a forum thread. ]

Jimmy Marr: I’ve seen this idea from you before, but it always seems to be presented in a slightly tangential manner like above. Can you develop it a little more here, or refer me to something elsewhere.

I kinda get it, and I think it’s very important, but I could benefit from further elucidation.

Is it the public schools’ refusal to teach phonetic reading technique that accomplishes the “mind binding”? How so?

It’s my fault I’ve never marketed my writing particularly. I’m sure I’ve written fairly directly on this before, and I’m sure I could search all night and not find it.

What you refer to is an important concept, and easily explained.

There are different levels of things. One is easy to see. Others are subtle, secondary – but even more dangerous, even stronger.

Ok, so I’m an evil jew. I want to fuck up little Jimmy Marr’s head. How do I do it?

The crudest, most obvious way: I create public schools. I force JM’s parents to pay a ‘public school’ tax, or whatever I call it. I force young master JM to attend classes all day, like a day jail. In those classes I harangue him, I brainwash him, I boss him around, I ring bells at him, I make him march, I whistle at him, I make him wear ugly clothes, and square dance and if he points his finger like a gun, I call the cops. If he moves more than once an hour, I send him to the school nurse, refer him to the school shrink, get him on drugs. I stamp out any signs of masculinity, badthink or initiative. I make him docile, pliant, compliant, scared – I put fear and passivity in him, as much as I can.

But we get ahead of ourselves.

I can abuse you by brainwashing you. By telling you what you have to believe. By rewarding you if you parrot my line. And by punishing you if you don’t.

That is the obvious intellectual terrorism (that our schools engage in).

But the LESS obvious is more interesting and more important.

As someone said, in every society there’s an orthodoxy, and if you fall afoul of it, you’ll suffer. That’s unrelated to jew-specific political correctness, it’s just an innate human tendency to groupthink and groupact and groupjudge. PC is simply a much harsher manifestation this tendency can be forced to to take, a channel it can be forced into. As opposed to, say, a Catholic society under Franco where you suffer if you get divorced, or wear a bikini at a public beach. That Is Not Done, and people look down on you.

So there’s the top level – teaching us the party line. And punishing us if we disagree: here’s what you must believe. Here’s the state religion. Here’s what we’re going to do to you if you resist.

Easy to grasp. There’s a partyline, set down by the powers that be, and you’d better believe it, or you will suffer.

The jews have achieved this power over us, to where they can set lines and dictate.

But they aren’t content with that.

They don’t just want no opposition, they want opposition not even to be possible. Not even to occur to people. Not even to be capable of forming.

That requires second-level operations. Beyond brainwashing/parroting. It requires salting the fields of Carthage, or destroying the machine-tool shop. It requires binding minds. And deforming character.

The ideal Aryan, according to the jews of the Frankfurt School

Any qualities of mind or character that can lead to independence, to continence, to self-control, essentially, for lack of a better word, can lead to jew-opposition. The jew would prefer you behave like the person in the cartoon above, from the story here. Remember the backdrop here: the Frankfurt school. Jews believe Aryan males are inherently ‘authoritarian personalities.’ This personality tends to lead to jew-opposition. Well ordered minds lead to well ordered lives and well ordered families in well ordered communities – in which the jew and the barrier-breaking and social destruction he prides himself on are unappealing and looked down upon. So this personality must be excised or thwarted or deformed. How is this done?

By character, it’s done by promoting sexual laxness – promiscuity. This is why everything is hypersexualized in the anti-white media. Sex changes from a private matter of bonding and reproduction to a matter of public titillation and obsessions. This is why a host never discusses jewish power without getting a pink slip but is perfectly free to ramble on for hours about masturbation. Remember what the wise man said: they take your political freedom, your independence, and give you sexual license in exchange. That’s been borne out over the 20th century.

By mind, it’s done by teaching reading by a method that frustrates the student. Getting him to hate reading. Reading, after all, is the gate through which almost all learning must enter. So let’s get the dirty little shaigetz and shiksa to associate it with pain. This is the ‘look-say’ method of reading instruction, where English is taught as Chinese – as thousands of different word-pictures, rather than a small set of letters (26) and sounds (roughly 70), whereby new words can be decoded, sounded out, they dont have to be memorized and remembered.

If the purpose of a public school is to educate children, why is the main means of education (beyond personal experience) — reading — taught by a method KNOWN NOT TO WORK? How can that possibly be? There’s only one answer: thwarting the ability to read and the desire to read is the real mission of the ‘teachers.’ It takes roughly 100 hours of instruction in the three Rs to produce a student capable of the basics – which are all he needs to learn anything else he needs. 100 hours is a few weeks. But public schools endure for sixteen years! And most victims go on to ‘college.’ The mission of this institution is clearly something other than the ostensible.

Public school is a funhouse – nothing is what it appears to be. From the name on down, it’s a bunch of lies. The only purpose of the public school is to create stunted cretins who look to the state (produced by ZOG) to solve all their problems. The exact opposite of what America was created, as a political structure, to do, which was basically defend the coasts, and leave the people alone.

Basically, what I’m saying is that the jews go beyond simply putting out a propaganda line and enforcing agreement, they and their institutions actively work to destroy any ostensibly neutral intellectual or character faculties that they know will tend to produce ‘anti-semites,’ simply because they produce thinking, initiative-taking agents.

In my life, I’ve read more than anyone who’s not a working academic, I’d suppose. The one and only time I came close to really hating to read was in junior high, when we were assigned Shane. The book the movie is based on. Very interesting stuff. But we had to write a synopsis of every stupid three chapters. It was absolutely boring and awful. And that was the intent. Even an interesting book can be made horrible by this kind of approach. What they’re trying to do is get people to hate and avoid that icky reading stuff, and leave it to the trained perfessionals. let them do the thinking and the heavy lifting. Just content yourself with shitty pop fiction, if you must read. Leave the hardback books to the jews, the intellectuals, the leaders. Your job is to watch sports, jerk off to jew-produced porn, and obey, obey, obey.

Now obviously the jews cant destroy all other intelligence. But they’d like to. If they are ever able to locate what the jews call ‘hate’ or ‘racism’ in white brains, jews will lobby Congress to pass a law mandating ‘hate’ lobotomies. If you or anyone think I am kidding, you don’t understand how jews think and operate. Short of literally cutting out pieces of white men’s brains, jews can fuck up children’s heads by creating a reverse reality in the mass media they alone control, and foster a hatred of thinking and reading, a hard-core anti-intellectualism, among the public schools whose teachers have been trained by marxist jews through the college system.

Besides teaching reading, the basic intellectual tool, by methods that don’t work, in order to frustrate and retard students’ intellectual growth, jews also attack agency in their language. They encourage students to participate, unwittingly, in their own character deformation and physical destruction. The latter through encouraging race mixing with muds, who are lower IQ and violent, all around less desirable, and characterwise by obsessing about their own looks and self-esteem, and coming to believe that their own opinion is somehow valuable in its own right, rather than valuable insofar as it corresponds to something in the real world. ‘Students,’ or victims of public schools, are trained to become selfish, passive clones. Public schools serve the agenda of the jews perfectly, but they also serve the agenda of giant corporations trying to stifle developments from bright individuals. This in fact, if you read the leftists like Gatto, was a huge influence on the American public school system from the late 1800s on. Of course, he is ignorant or doesn’t mention the jewish/state agenda, because leftists prefer to blast corporations, as you know.

All kinds of research confirms what I’m saying. The problem is that nearly all explanations of the type I’m attempting here come from christians or former schoolteachers or neocon goys. They are fine as far as they go, but they leave out the jewish heart of the problem – today. Jews were not involved at the start of this problem, which goes back, in America, to a set of Protestant nuts in Massachusetts, but the system those moralizing control-freak zanies created fit jewish needs perfectly when they came to America and began propagating their poison through Columbia Teachers College, which is the one the other schools of education around the country take their bearing from. E. Michael Jones covers some of this. Christian homeschooling writers have their angle. Former PS teacher John Gatto has his semi-leftist anti-corporate approach. And of course we have our WN approach, we incorporates what we know about jews, specifically their hatred of whites, their belief that the way to destroy us is through promoting social looseness, particularly regarding sex.

So in conclusion, of course jews smack down direct opposition as hate, and use their institutions to produce parrots and weaklings. But it goes beyond that. They seek to destroy the white man in body, mind, and character – and they use the institutions they control, in a coordinated way, to do just this.

Loose sex – spreads disease. Weakens bodies. Reduces reproduction. Weakens family ties. Exhibits a ratchet effect or multiplier over generations. To children never conceived, no children can be born. To children perverted into homosexual behavior, no children will be born. To children dead of AIDS, or made barren by chlamydia, no children will be born. So it is with drinking and drugs. People fucked up on them will have fewer and worse families. People who race mix will have inferior families, less threatening to jews because of their inferior behavior and lower mental ceilings, compared to white families. The more mixed families there are, the harder for white families to maintain their success rates and success patterns. The laws, media and schools are all worked to create what jews would call a ‘hostile environment for whites’ if the sides were reversed. Everything is done to make solid white society impossible and, barring that, undesirable.

Destroy the character of a man – get him hooked on vices, drugs, sex, rock ‘n’ roll. Get him to accede in lies – this is the real purpose of PC. It destroys character. Tens of millions of white men are knowing going along with statements about diversity they know aren’t true. In an anti-intellectual culture as the jews have created in AmeriKwa, this seems like no big deal. We all lie a little. But it is a big deal. Integrity does mean something. You can’t continually accede in lies and keep a solid charcter. The jews know this. That’s why they’re so hot to make sure that no esteemed public figure ever gets away with saying something unPC. Example is the discoverer of DNA, forced to resign and apologize because he voiced an accurate generalization about black mental aptitudes. We’re a society far gone when our heroes give in like that, and we sit by and watch and do nothing. We’re in a dark age, made dark by our cowardice, more than any other factor. The jews aren’t so smart. They do dominate us though. Why? Because we are afraid of them. We have chosen to be cowards. We should be ashamed of ourselves. But we’re not. Jews have promoted a culture of shamelessness, we can note.

Intellectually – we’ve been over this. They train us to read by methods that don’t work. So we’re smart enough to read a menu at a Macdonald’s but no smarter. We don’t want to read anything serious. We don’t want any serious thoughts. We want to watch tv, cheer football teams, be satisfied with the utterly jejune and reality-reverse stereotyping in any pop fiction we read during our annual week at the beach. We are consumers. We are unindividuated individuals. We are voters. We are democrats. We are clowned clowns who don’t realize what’s been taken from us under our nose. We are fools and idiots who think we’re free and independent agents. We are pathetic.

The notion of agency is what triggered all this. Free will. Who is responsible for human actions? Individual men, or social forces and fate? Most people say the first but believe the second. The interests of the jews and the state dovetail. They both find an interest in promoting the idea that people need the state to serve their needs. Jews play on and off agency as suits their purpose. Nigs are never guilty of their actions. White (nationalists) are always responsible – not just for their own actions but for the actions of the blacks they ‘hate’ too! I’m not exaggerating. This is exactly how the jewsmedia plays it. For example, any white murdered by a nigger he said anything the jew can construe as epithet to is responsible for what happens to him. Jews also like to blame WN for their own destruction, implying or stating its because of their ideals they are brought low. They are trying to get whites to think: if you hold these beliefs, bad things will inevitably happen to you. Yeah – because of jews. Jews do bad things, but hide their hand. Most goyim are religious idiots. Another example is the meme among christards that “god blesses those who help Israel, and hurts those who don’t.” Jews play with agency and responsibility as serves their purpose, and they enlist or enmist their ins and outs with secular-religious mumbo-jumbo. Same with homosexuality. It’s a noble and moral thing when two queers want to go public or get married, but it’s also a thing of scandal if one of their enemies is revealed to indulge in the behavior. Jews turn everything to their purpose. What is most damaging to Aryans generally, to anyone generally, is what they do in their schools: teach against concepts of agency. Downtalk enterprise (business, free markets), talk up service and ‘needs’ and ‘victims’ and ‘legacies.’ No one is ever responsible for his actions until he opposes the jews, then he’s responsible for everything. This is the white man as guilty class. As some have pointed out, the white man takes the place of the capitalist in marxist ideology. Like a witch, he’s capable of every sort of evil, and no stone goes unturned in discovering his evil pale hand.

These thoughts are quick and not as well organized as they could be, but let me try yet another summing:

The first level is to tell you what to believe.

The deeper level is to deny you the tools to reason rightly yourself. So that you can’t even form wrong opinion, wrong meaning perceived-as-dangerous-by-jews. This second, deeper level is achieved by the coordinated use of the major institutions of society to create a milieu that is White-uncomfortable to white-impossible and meant to lead to the deepest and final level: white-nonexistence, as declared for quite openly by jew Ignatiev, among others. Also involved, at the instrumental level, are the use of certain techniques to warp the mind, such as the look-say method of ‘teaching reading.’ All this is wrapped, of course, in the smothering plastic of ‘gaslighting,’ whereby none of what is going on is ever spoken about, or admitted when charged, or acknowledged in any way. Studies have shown people sweat bullets when they disagree with a few others on the length of a pencil, so how in the world can they brave the rare perception that something as profound and awful as what I describe is actually happening when no one around them ever says anything! But it is happening, it is by design, and it is intended to warp and confuse our people, and to lead, ultimately, to their disappearance from the face of the earth. Christ – which jewish ‘holiday’ – literally holy day – is NOT a celebration of another race’s genocide! That right there ought to tell us something.

Let me try it again. Jews don’t just tell you the right things to say and believe, they don’t just give your the lines to parrot, they do their level best to destroy your moral character and your ability to reason. And they have overwhelming media and public-institutional control behind them.

Is said Great minds think alike. Better said, minds functioning correctly arrive in the same place. They may not feel the same about the destination their right-reasoning leads to, but they will end up at the same conclusion. That’s what makes reason reason, and what makes it pro-social, as opposed to anti-social religion.

Destroying the reasoning capacity of competing races is ‘good for jews.’ Not just filling heads with bad and self-destructive ideas, but preventing heads from thinking at all. That’s where their safety lies. Next to getting rid of competing races physically and entirely via genocide. Anyone who can think and who applies his thinking mechanism to a study of jewish behavior will reach the same conclusions I have expressed about what jews are doing. He may not then draw the conclusion I have – that we should fight back against the jews and the world they’re trying to create, but he won’t be able honestly or rationally to deny that my description of their behavior and motives fits their historical record, and is demonstrably manifest in what they actually do in daily life. This fact – that what they call ‘antisemitism’ is one very likely reaction, the normal reaction I have said, to their proven historical pattern of behavior – represents a threat to jews, potentially even an existential threat to them, if I can persuade enough people my solutio to the threat they pose to Aryans and other goyim is best — and they are not going to sit there while even the POTENTIAL for opposition exists.

Jews have mostly destroyed their real opponents. Now they are worried about potential opponents. You certainly won’t learn the truth about jews in the schools they control by indoctrinating the education majors who become the teachers, you will only learn the truth about jews by either dealing with jews directly, which is likelier to give you indigestion than comprehensive intellectual understanding, or by reading certain material, and thinking your way to a conclusion. This kind of intelligence is rare enough, but by deliberately making public education about socialization rather than intellectual development, jews can shrink the pool of potential ‘anti-semites’ as they call them. Here they work hand in glove with the non-jew Deweyites who, in America at least, preceded them and, as it were, set the table for them. Dewey wanted cogs for a central-government bureaucrats serving a new world order; jews want cogs and clones for their own reasons – so they can rule and everyone else can serve them as retarded, mixed-race slaves. The public school system serves both agendas – the racist jews and the anti-racist NWO WASP-Anglomanic high-minded universalist one-worlder crowd.

So jews have two theaters of operations:

Lies and lie-enforcement (hate crimes law, thought crimes enforcement)

and

Destruction of hostile intelligence, real or potential. The fewer ‘anti-semites’ there are in the world, the fewer men, parties, publications, the easier to defame and destroy them; the more, the harder. Beyond this, they work on sowing the fields with salt. That means anti-intellectual education focused on social attitudes rather than genuine learning as the basis of public education. That’s been going on in America since the 1920s, at least. That’s the notion of progressive education, which jews have adapted to their own ends, so that little white kids-to-be-mentally-warped are force-fed Anne Frank in both history and English.

Whatever traditional i.e. real education promotes – intellectual and character Bildung, basically – jew-controlled public ‘education’ works to destroy. Destroy the body with promiscuity, destroy the character with by encouraging or forcing accession in known lies, (instruct the youth of the goyim in doctrines WE KNOW TO BE FALSE, as the jews say in Protocols), and destroy the mind by focusing it on base things and personal details and attitude-striking rather than genuine factual learning about the real external world.

The fruit of jews’ labor is to produce grabbag mixed-race 90-IQ helots with no idea who they are, living in a world dominated by racist jews who know exactly what they are.

By Alex Linder

[ The following is from a forum thread posting. ]

I will write the following in my favorite tongue, near English. If ebonics be legit, then mebonics be legitter. I declare I will practice sociology without a license. Unsafe sociology is the best kind, it nearly goes without saying. I will divine from signs, like a haruspex, but working dry. This is a Pomona professoress, recently deceased. Her name is Hagedorn, pretty sure that’s German, not jewish, from New Jersey, into Santeria, of all things. This is the odd sort of creature liberalism abounds with. German-descended liberals mesh very nicely with English-descended libs. Germans have always been known for traveling around, sniffing things, and a certain strain of this impulse routinely throws up creatures like La Hagedorn.

http://discussions.latimes.com/20/la…rn-20131119/10

Katherine Hagedorn dies at 52; Pomona professor was Santeria priestess

Katherine Hagedorn, a longtime music professor at Pomona College in Claremont, became a Santeria priestess after years of studying sacred bata drums.

Look at the look on the dark girl’s face – that’s your classic ‘minority’ (that aint) responding to your overly intelligent, caring, helpful white liberal. If you were a mud, you wouldn’t like white people either – although you’d damn sure like their bodies and what they put together for themselves, as Sam Kinison put it.

By David Colker

November 18, 2013, 10:39 a.m.

Katherine Hagedorn was not your stereotypical priestess in the Cuba-based Santeria religion, known for its complex, ecstatic drumming that adherents believe can call forth deities.

She grew up in New Jersey, was white, had a doctorate in music and was a longtime popular professor at Pomona College.

But as a graduate student on a cold, rainy day at Brown University in 1988, she spotted a poster for an upcoming performance by an Afro-Cuban ensemble of drummers and dancers. The performance changed her life.

Hagedorn traveled to Cuba, studied with masters of sacred bata drums, and after a decade of practice and study, became initiated into Santeria as a priestess. It was a journey from academic objectivity to total involvement in a world that once seemed entirely foreign to her.

“My wide-angle lens of folkloric performance,” she wrote, “had suddenly zoomed in to the close-up focus of personally experienced religious performance.”

Hagedorn died Nov. 12 at home in Claremont after a long struggle with cancer, said Pomona College. She was 52, and had been part of the school’s music faculty since 1993.

Drumming was just one of several topics she taught at the school. She also oversaw the Balinese Gamelan ensemble and taught courses in gender in music, performance traditions of the African diaspora and protest music. Her classes were emphatically participatory, not to mention loud.

“If we are learning about West African music, if we’re reading about it, listening to it, we’re playing it too,” she said in a 2001 Pomona College Magazine article. “Same with Tuvan throat singing and Balinese Gamelan. I try to get the students to do it.”

In 2000, Hagedorn was named California Professor of the Year by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and the Council for Advancement and Support of Education.

She’s red-stamped “good” by the System. Nothing more Systemic than Carnegie Foundation.

Katherine Johanna Hagedorn was born Oct. 16, 1961, in Summit, N.J. Her undergraduate degree was from Tufts University, with a triple major in Spanish, Russian and English studies, plus a minor in classical piano. She earned a master’s degree in international relations from John Hopkins University and a master’s and doctorate from Brown in ethnomusicology.

Now that’s very interesting. Many do not know that New Jersey has plenty of rural area, and plenty of people of German descent, as well as the Italians and jews everyone knows about. Now, the fact that Hagedorn went to Tufts is very interesting, as this is a jewish college. Not all Tufts students are jews. It makes my theory Hagedorn is German rather than jewish less likely, but I still would guess it’s the case. The way she wears her hair, in the photo, and her dress, suggest it. The way she gathers her hands suggests Germanic plainscrub piety, rather than jewish accusatory meddling-hectoring. It is clear this unadorned Hagedorn’s a rather plain but intelligent white applemeat woman. And it is a guess. Altho her concerns touch on the leftist litany, the feminism etc doesn’t appear to be the driving force. She probably belongs to the group that assimilates the going ideals and agenda without any internal objections. Her interest in Santeria and its oinks was no doubt genuine; more that Hagedorn’s peculiar interests fit The Agenda, were useful to the System, than that she was an aggressive driver.

In 1989, she made the first of many trips to Cuba to study bata drums, which are played in sets of three. “The only way you can learn to play those things is to be taught by someone who is an expert, who is consecrated,” said Raul Fernandez, professor of Latin American studies at UC Irvine. “They knew she was honest and truly interested, not there on some capricious whim.”

I remember being in some hall at Pomona, and hearing some earnest liberal say something on the order of, “every time I hear drums, I feel like I’m stealing black culture.” I did not grow up among this type; statements like this were the first time I knew it existed. That is, I knew liberals existed from reading the newspaper, but to catch the real flavor of this type and its mindset, have to hear it first-ear.

She completed her first step of initiation into Santeria about a year after her studies of the bata drum began, but then took each subsequent step only after “much trepidation” and self-examination, “shying away from what appeared to be my religious calling,” she wrote in her book.

This is why we call liberals onionskins. All this sensitivity. These tears. These trembling vacillations. Yet they turn into great hostile white sharks if you cross them. Crossing them could mean harshly, as in mocking with laughter, or merely softly, with plain honest rational questions. You’ll receive dark return. You’ll learn, as all before you, that liberals have endless boundless love of their inferiors — roughly, all muds and white deviants — and boundless hatred of all their equals – whites and other intelligent folk who don’t think the way they do. Invisible plantations and invisible apartheid are their preferred forms. Where a white man, a right man, builds a real-world segregation system based on rational reasons; a liberal creates an invisible empire based on irrational hatreds.

Back to the story – what on earth would Haggy be trepidatin’ about? What’s not to love about Santeria? It sounds colorful and delicious, like a scooped-out watermelon filled with delicious and colorful mixed fruits. Or like a gutter gushing with delicious red Kool-Aid recently liberated from the throat of an uninnocent yardfowl. Ah, but that’s why I can’t be a liberal. That’s why I failed to cult up like a real softspoken man of the world. My plebeian need to guffaw (a guffaw is a fart to these people), my boorish insistence on the actually-real were too great. How could Katy’s delicate emotional conscience handle the rude combo of spicy drums and exsanguinated roosters? Well, we don’t know that, we can’t enter a plain woman’s heart. We can only know the outcome. I divine from the ether that the soft, noble soul of La Hagedorn was in her delicate, sensitiver-than-sensitive way essaying a new branch of Santeria; poking out a new vein of the Old Thing like a watercolorist with his thin swirled brush eking out a new brown tree branch. A new vein that would sacrifice date palms, or ground nuts, or some other native African vegetable, rather than meaty breathers. It’s not easy being a liberal. No one ever said that. But with enough patience, sensitivity, imagination, sighs, grants, fellowships, and Gone-Fishing signs over the eyelids, one can overcome the obstacles and unite the opposites. Some thought crimes law doesn’t hurt either. Makes it all cohere, you know. Like corn starch in your cooking pot.

When she finally became a priestess, she wore a special outfit for the occasion. It had tiny figures believed to represent vegetarian Santeria priests sacrificing avocados and pineapples on ex-sanguinary altars. Goats that formerly would have been the star of the show now allowed to lick the spilled juices after the service. Friends say she had her gorgeous raiment hand-sewn by an Equitorial Guinean sewing circle microbusiness she encountered on a research trip to Central Africa.

“It’s the dress she will be wearing when she is buried,” said her friend Margaret Waller, a professor of French at Pomona.

Hagedorn is survived by her husband, Terry Ryan, a professor at Claremont Graduate University’s Center for Information Systems & Technology; a son, Gabriel; her parents, Fred and Grace Hagedorn; and her sister Martha Hagedorn-Krass.

Further evidence Hagedorn was probably German rather than jewess.

david.colker@latimes.com

She does not whiff jewish, going by her particulars. Now, the interesting thing here is how this apparently mild woman would have felt about the thing most associated with Santeria – the thing it’s known for: animal sacrifices. One wonders if anyone anywhere ever pressed her on this, how she felt about it. I highly doubt it. Many things evil when white men do them are noble or at least not-to-be-mentioned when darkies do ’em. Sniffing these fine differences is what makes the liberal a connoisseur.

http://www.latimes.com/obituaries/la…#ixzz2ln5ELhmL

By Alex Linder

[ The following is from a forum thread posting. ]

democracy is a weasel word, as used by the powers that be. in one day we have seen the democratic will of the majority (defense of marriage act, simply tossed out by a US judge). and now we see a private company complying with a political authority’s request to shut down a particular account because it was transmitting political opinions that are “illegal” in a democracy because they threaten the basis of that democracy. well, that’s certainly an interesting paradox now, isn’t it?: free expression of opinion isn’t the basis of democracy but a threat to it! and should the wrong opinion make it all the way into law, when then we can simply have a king, a know-better, toss the law out on its ear and encode what the public should have voted as the law of the land. thus we see that democracy is not the rule of the people but rule in the name of the people…by a tiny minority of people that is at odds with the people. so democracy is rule by an elite, but not just an elite, an elite hostile to the majority of the people. thus the term ‘democracy’ is a verbal camouflage. it conceals the nature of the operation from those not paying attention. and this is why the powers that be can go on and on about democracy and the will of the people while always siding with the alien over the native, the sex deviant over the normal, and the censor over the free-speaker.

By Alex Linder

The power in nigger is that the truth it contains is undeniable. Niggers exist. And they’re worthless. And we all know it. And that term shows it.

The christ cultists can go on and on about every Apocrine-American possessing an “eternal soul” of “inestimable worth,” and that lie sells among the pious and timid, but there will always remain a minority with the audacity to accept the information its feelers are transmitting. And those feelers, those tentacles, those particle-collectors scream as one: niggers exist – but they shouldn’t. Nigger cuts through the bullshit, the endless feed and stream issuing unceasingly from every lying church and school and media outlet on the planet, and that is why nigger will never, ever go away. If nigger didn’t apply, its application wouldn’t hurt, and the powers that be would laugh at it rather than ban it. The fact that niggers exist is also longstanding proof that the powers of the baptismal fount and the sociological wizards are considerably less than advertised. The nigger represents a professional failure on the part of the christ and sociology cults, and the alchemists grow red-faced when you bring it up. Your use of nigger is like chiding an Original Alchemist for his inability to turn lead into gold.

The only word with even more power than nigger is racist. The taboos around racism and nigger are of course from the same cloth. Racism only works because people let it. It’s a one-word verbal trick equivalent to the question “have you stopped beating your wife yet?” It can’t be answered with one word, it requires an explanation. But the minute you explain, you’re on the defensive, which means you’ve lost, because you’ve acknowledged the need to defend yourself. You wouldn’t need defense if you weren’t guilty. So the charge of racism has no meaning other than its function, which is a direct assault on your moral probity. So you can either respond by implicitly acknowledging the character attack with a fuck-you, or you can counter attack, per the Mantra, for example, by calling the perpetrator of the verbal attack something equally heavy: an anti-White. But losers — Southerners, conservatives, idiots, religious cretins — prefer to take the defensive. Nazis win. I’m-not,-sees always lose. And they’re too dumb even to figure out why.

Always attack. Only attack. Never defend.

Politics 101.

[ The above is from a forum thread posting. ]