The Great Black Dope: Why the Crusade to Replace White QBs with Niggers Is Doomed to Fail

By Alex Linder

[ The following is from a forum thread posting. ]

Football is the main sport in America. Most popular with the fans. Most popular with the tv-watching public. Football’s number-one position is quarterback. The QB is nearly as important to the outcome of a given game as the pitcher in baseball. Certainly the QB is always the locus of media attention, and the subject of endless discussion on sports radio. If the QB succeeds, he becomes the face of the franchise, a staple of the community, and a man with more philanthropic and commercial opportunities than he can handle. It is no joke to say a dominant and successful QB, such as John Elway, is second only to the president or big-name entertainers in his social and role-model power.

For all these reasons, promoting niggers as QBs is an important political mission in the controlled media, which in sports means ESPN. Given that, as I’ve turned the Clausewitz phrase, mass sports is politics by different means, having blacks as visible heads and team leaders in the most popular sports helps fans draw the inaccurate conclusion that these creatures of jungle really are our equals; that they really are good people it is safe to have our sons and daughters and families around; and, finally, that ‘African-Americans’ can be trusted to lead the way in other arenas of life just as they do on the football field. The truth, of course, is that blacks are as incompetent at QB as they are at everything else.

Historically blacks were ignored as QB candidates because of the race’s mental defects. Blacks are dumb. Blacks have poor judgment. Blacks lack impulse control. Blacks lack self control. The same qualities that lead them to failure in wider society lead them to failure at QB. Too dumb to read defenses, ie figure out where to throw the ball. Too lazy to prepare their body and brain in order to realize their potential. Too apt to get into fights and draw penalties if somebody says something on the field they don’t like.

The mass media overlook these racial tendencies on the football field just as they overlook them in broader society. They might blame a black individual here and there for his failings, but the racial generalization is never made. Racial generalizations are only acceptable if they’re pro-black or anti-White. Never if they’re pro-White or anti-black. Just as the media blame black crime and education/employment failure in broader society on racism, racism too is the culprit when it comes to why blacks have traditionally not been a factor at QB. Never, ever do blacks fail on their own merits. Always it’s some white man, or some white attitude, holding them back.

To reverse history and make progress in football, ESPN and every other mainstream outlet for at least the last twenty years has promoted the idea of the black QB. The subideas are simple: blacks have everything they need, mentally and physically, to succeed at QB. The reason they have failed historically is that they haven’t been tried. This is due solely to white racism, which holds they lack the mental ability to play the position. Slowly, too slowly, this attitude is changing. And we the media will hold the owners’ and coaches’ feet to the fire until blacks dominate the position, like they do most others in professional football. Anything short of that end state signifies that racism still exists and must be battled.

The practical effect of this jewish ideology — whites must be driven out of all traditional power positions, in sports and society, replaced with jews and other minorities — which underlies literally every single sports report you have ever seen, listened to or read in the controlled media, is that ESPN routinely and deliberately — by policy — overestimates the value of black quarterbacks. It would be comically amusing to see every last jew-ESPN-promoted black QB get overdrafted and then fail except that the opportunity cost is years of wasted time on the bench for superior but underrated white QBs. This is blatant racial discrimination – and in a league that, like the media itself, is supposedly driven by money more than by a political agenda. In neither case is is so. There is undeclared anti-white discrimination in the NFL just as there is overt and legally mandated discrimination in every other big business.

The jewish position is the sports version of the Brezhnev doctrine: what’s ours is ours, and what’s yours is up for grabs. In football, as in wider society, that means traditionally white positions must be taken over by blacks. While traditionally black positions must remain black. Whereas the NFL was about 50-50 black and white this time in the ’80s, today in 2012 it is more like 80-20. Defenses are almost wholly black, except for linebackers and occasional linesmen. Offenses feature white QBs, occasional white FBs, and a good number of white linesmen. If whites can be displaced from playing QB, they will have very little room left on the playing field except at punter and placekicker. QB is not just another position, after all. The QB gets the most attention, so that even if every other position is filled by blacks, the QB will still get as much attention as the rest of the spots combined. For that reason it is politically necessary and desirable to install as many black QBs into the position as possible.

The problem for the hebrews dictating content on ESP is that NFL is a billion-dollar business driven by money-hungry owners (most of them jews – a fact that is literally never mentioned in the jew-controlled mass media that whine about diversity nonstop) who must cater to the public to keep the profits high (1), and that White men are much better at playing QB than blacks (2). Big Jew has not found a way around these facts yet. He is reduced to pumping up yet another black beyond its ability, then making excuses for it as it falls back to earth. And after it can’t be denied, even the jew will finally admit the fact, though of course it will never admit to the political impetus driving the overrating in the first place.

ESPN claimed for years, although it has backed off the last couple, that the very position of quarterback was changing. It was evolving into one that blacks are better equipped to fill, because they are fleeter of foot. The “quarterback of the future” would be a hybrid runner/passer, as likely to burn you with his legs as his arm. The star in this campaign was the Virginia ghetto nigger Michael Vick. Vick was faster even than most running backs, and could pass well enough to achieve some success. Never as much as predicted though, and given his niggery stupidity you would predict based on his background, was soon jailed for some really disgusting dogfighting. It was so off-putting whites even ventured to make protest, something they don’t even do when their own daughters are molested, raped and murdered by the likes of herpes-infected Vicks.

But we stray from the point. There is no new QB. The position is not evolving. Or, not evolving any more than the other positions are – toward greater size and speed. QB remains a position that demands passing accuracy, judgment and calmness more than footspeed, and the idea that running is anything more than a significant secondary ability in a QB has been effectively disproved. A QB that can run but is weaker at passing goes nowhere. Whereas a QB who can’t run much but can pass well is fully capable of winning the Super Bowl. The position remains what it ever was.

But ESPN keeps the flame alive. Keeps promoting the next great black dope as the guy who’s going to change it all and redeem the headless nigger in the eyes of the racists.

Let’s now run down the NFL’s five (out of 32) starting black QBs and see how they’re faring in relation to the ESPN ‘narrative’ they’re supposed to be filling out.

1) Michael Vick: was to be the prototype of the ‘new’ QBs. He was the first black QB to be picked first in the draft. He played six years for Atlanta, was in jail two years for dogfighting, has played the last three for the Philadelphia Eagles. For all his problems, he has done better than any other modern black QB since Warren Moon. But he has never won a Super Bowl or a conference championship. Since his release from jail, the media picked right back up overrating his ability and his team’s chances. Last Sunday he and the Eagles, favored by 3′ on the road, got their ass kicked by a Arizona Cardinals team headed by his former white backup, Kevin Kolb. Final score was 27-6. The white and particularly the black ESPN sports ‘experts’ and ‘analysts’ predicted the Vick-led Eagles would take the game. Black analysts always side with niggers, unless the ESPN producers tell the white and black analysts on a panel to race-swap their positions on some particularly dangerous ‘issue,’ in order to keep down potential racial unrest. It is ok if blacks generally side with blacks, but never ok if white analysts do that. Nor is it kosher to point out that that is exactly what’s going on. So far in 2012 we can say that the Eagles were overrated going into the season, and after a lucky win at extremely weak Cleveland, they are lucky to walk out of Arizona 2-1. The bottom line is they are clearly not as good a team as the media has made them out to be.

2) Cam Newton: This supersized-nigger was the talk of 2011. He came out of the gate quickly, piling up stats, but ended up fading over the course of the season. Which fact was far less remarked on. It was all him when Carolina was doing well, but when he suffered it was simply because he was a rookie going through growing pains. The guy is a straight up nigger. In college he stole someone’s laptop. This is a guy who knows he’s going to make big bucks in the NFL, but he lacks the mental ability to think out how a theft might limit his endorsements and hurt his career. The classic nigger inability to think even five seconds ahead is obvious in his behavior. It’s obvious in face too. He has an attractive, unlined face, very large like OJ Simpson, and it’s a face unlined with care because like most niggers its owner isn’t capable of lines-producing thought. That’s why jackoffs love to talk about those beautiful smiles niggers have. So open, so friendly. There’s only a few IQ points’ difference between a nigger like Cam Newton and a Down Syndrome retard, and that’s why they smile the same. Drafting this nigger will in time prove to have been a mistake. Even though the guy has talent and is large and can run, he’s ultimately too mentally incompetent too succeed at QB. Which is all the ‘racists’ — ie, reality fans, respecters of reality — ever said.

Just today the big debate on ESPN’s big morning show, First Take, based around ‘debates’ between (black) Stephen A. Smith and (white) Skip Bayless, featured a discussion of a cartoon that came out making fun of Cam Newton. Newton, in a truly classic nigger, mugged and vamped after scoring a touchdown in a recent game. The touchdown made the score 7 for his guys to 23 for the opponent. That means nothing to a nigger, because to a nigger all that matters is the chance to promote oneself and/or act like a jackass by going into some pre-practiced routine, in nigger Newton’s case, some ripping the shirt back to reveal the Superman S on his chest. The ‘toon mocked this monkeyman

thusly:

Very funny. Very apt. Newton acted like a nigger. In human society, you don’t play the hero or the fool when you’re down 23-7, you hand the ball back to the ref and try to get back in the game. Niggers don’t think like this. And they don’t like being called on their niggery behavior. According to negro Smith, we are the cartoon “lampooned” nigger Newton. It mocked him. He strove to make a distinction between criticizing the nigger and mocking him. It is ok to criticize the holy nigger – but only from an abject position of complete and total respect. They are owed that much for historical reasons. And they will use that “history” until the end of time to force you, white sucker, to bown down to them, and accept second place in the racial hierarchy.

This is what you can expect if blacks ever complete their takeover of the US: criticism of niggers will be overtly forbidden, let alone laughing at them. The minute you lose the freedom to laugh, you are already a subject and a clown. We owe niggers nothing. They are ridiculous and if we’re not laughing at them, then we become ridiculous too. Go back to Freaka if you don’t feel you’re getting the proper respect, useless niggers. We don’t want you here anyway. Bayless disagreed with nig Smith, but of course he did it only after a disclaimer that was three times as long as the quibble he everntually ended up registering. If that’s the future you like, white man, that’s the future you’ll get if you keep on tolerating this shit.

White man must be every endlessly “sensitive” to niggers and their needs.

Have you ever, ONCE, heard of a nigger being sensitive to a white man? A nigger mocked by other niggers, or brought to heel, for not showing white man his due respect? Of course not. Niggers never show respect for whites, nor does any media personality ever take up for whites. But whites are called on to show endless respect for niggers. The fool you flatter is the fool you become. If you want to become a third class citizen by jews and the niggers they exalt over you, then go along with the racial submission modeled by Skip Bayless and the other white niglickers on ESPN.

If black QBs can’t succeed on their own merits, why would any self-respecting white man want to help them succeed by lying about their character and ability? He wouldn’t. But that is just what every single white analyst on ESPN does. They save their real venom and any sharp attacks they might care to levy for the white QBs. Of whom criticism will only raise you in the graces of the kike producers running the network.

3) Robert Griffin The Third: This guy took Cam Newton’s place at the forefront of the Nigger QB Promote Machine/Hype Index after Newton graduated to the pros. Out of Baylor, Griffin is a very fast runner and decent passer. Thanks purely to ESPN analyst hype, he eventually surpassed the most polished QB to come down the college pike in 20 years, Andrew Luck, and win the Heisman Trophy, the top individual award in college football. He ended up being drafted second behind Luck.

Griffin was drafted by the Washington Redskins, a team owned by an obnoxious, litigious jew named Daniel Snyder. He was to be the leader of 2-time Super Bowl winning coach Mike Shanahan’s rebuilt offense. Shanahan was betting his employment on black Griffin’s success. After a week one victory over New Orleans at New Orleans, it looked like everything was on the right road. After week three, the Redskins are 1-2. Griffin has some ability, and will probably end up being a low-mediocre pro QB, rather than washing out of the league like JaMarcus Russell or Vince Young. I don’t know of anything offhand to suggest his particularly stupid or niggery in behavior, and he seems fairly well spoken. The interesting racial angle as concerns Griffin is the white man behind him.

Kirk Cousins is the backup QB in D.C. He was drafted this year, same as Griffin. He had huge success in the preseason, whereas Griffin did not. He is an exceptionally attractive and intelligent young man, as can be seen in any interview. He’s out of Michigan State in the Big Ten. My guess is that he will end up starting at some other team, and have a career that dramatically outshines Griffin’s. It is a sure bet that after his stellar performance in one particular game in the preseason, in which Griffin played poorly, if their races had been reversed, you would have heard immediately about QB controversy. But since Cousins is white, the them ALL the media reports pushed was that Cousins and everybody else understand that he is just the backup, and the ‘Skins are Robert Griffin III’s team. Is is my hope that the Redskins will continue to fail as they have the last few years, and they will turn to Cousins and he will succeed.

Notable was ESPN’s Skip Bayless, for practically shitting himself on camera that someone was going to think the obvious and unthinkable – that just maybe white-man Cousins was better than black-man Griffin. Bayless, who is styled as a contrarian, with conservatism somewhat implied, beat the drum for the greatness of Griffin and may well have been responsible for his winning the Heisman over heavily favore white QB Andrew Luck. He expressed overt and explicit anger in panel discussions over the drafting of Cousins because he knew how good Cousins actually is, and he feared the competition would hurt Griffin’s psyche and chances. See, everybody’s a racist. Nobody believes blacks are equal to whites. But not everybody draws the conclusion about how we should act on this obvious inequality. Illiberals like Bayless draw the conclusion that blacks must be coddled, protected and excused, whether they’re playing QB or committing rapes and robberies. White subords like Bayless positively get off on championing the nigger over those of their own race, even as they deliberately market themselves as badass, say-anything contrarians. It is to laugh. Skip is a punk. He’s certainly astute. But that only means he knows damn well what he’s doing, which makes him doubly guilty.

4) Russell Wilson: This guy is the starting QB for Seattle. He threw the winning pass in this monday’s contest against Green Bay, which led to a scab-ref decision that gave Seattle the win. The nation was outraged. The ref strike was settled. But that doesn’t concern us. What does is that Wilson, in light of the not so good performances by other nigger QBs has come into vogue as the now-nig to be overpromoted in terms most purple. Here (around 15:00 mark) you can listen to ESPN’s Bill Simmons’ professional NFL analyst Mike Lombardi of the NFL Network discuss just how ridiculously exaggerated the talk about black Wilson’s performance has been. When even the controlled-media personnel are mentioing the fact, if never the reason, you know how bad it’s gotten. Wilson is not a particularly niggery nigger the way Newton and Vick are, but he’s small and quite slow. He figures to top out at low-average – if he doesn’t wash out of the league or end up as backup.

5) Josh Freeman: This nigger came on the scene in 2009. He had a fantastic 2010, then came back to earth in 2011. It appears that his success in 2010 was more due to a weak schedule than anything else. We’ll see how this former great hope will do. Tampa Bay is somewhat off the national radar, which tends to cover only a handful of teams until the playoffs at least. I don’t know anything in particular against Freeman’s character; he is a black-fathered mulatto from Kansas State, and 6’5″ as opposed to shrimpy and often-injured Michael Vick and comparatively diminutive Russell Wilson (5’11”).

There you have it. Five starting QBs out of 32 are black, and of them only one has substantial achievements: Michael Vick. And he has never won a conference championship, let alone a Super Bowl. His most remarkable achievement remains the fact that he has the fastest QB time ever documented in the 40-yard-dash: 4.33 on his Pro Day, and 4.25 another time.

Blacks will never succeed at QB in the future, apart from highly select and unusual individuals, for the same reason they’ve never succeeded in the past: they lack what Al Campanis, in the context of explaining why so few blacks are baseball managers, called ‘the necessities.’ It’s true. And it doesn’t stop being true because he got fired for saying it. Rather, he got fired for saying it because it’s true.

[Thanks for reading…next week I will write a column about Tim Tebow, explaining the remarkable phenomenon that is his pro career and its treatment in the controlled media.]

/ message
edit note


On conservatism

By Alex Linder

By all means, people are free to waste another 100 years speaking in their indoor voice, raising their niggling finger, and prefacing everything they say with disclaimers. But if you want change, you have to create a national angry groundswell willing to slur and kill and sup on the blood of its enemies, and you don’t get there by appealing to selfish bourgeois cowards…

We gotta be gross large powerful and scary as all fuck, like a great white shark maw coming up out of the water at the slick black jewmud-seal. We need fiery leaders who can orate and organize. And we need ass-kickers who can stomp all who get between our speakers and the ears and eyes of our people.

We get that, we will win.

[ The above is from a forum thread posting. ]

On nutshell of White-man-ism

By Alex Linder

I’m embarrassed to say I can’t find where I wrote at length about my philosophy, white-man-ism, vs the socialist/NS philosophy of white-ant-ism.

Anyway, my basic idea is that a new White state (no muds or jews, just Whites), will be governed at the highest level by Guardians, however these are set up institutionally. Protecting the race will be the only function of the national level of government.

The rest of the arrangements will be handled by white men themselves. They will live in microstates set up according to their tastes – socialist, catholic, libertarian, other.

Idea is that white men are both White and Men, and both their individual and collective natures should be respected.

White men can only flourish in a White context.

Without a White context, the creativity, beauty and individuation will disappear.

So it will be a capital matter to try to change the racial basis of the state.

The feds will run the nukes and whatever else they need to do to protect the race.

The rest will be left to white men to arrange as they see fit.

I claim nothing more for my ‘system’ than that it is preferable to others. I claim no special backing from god, nature or any other imaginary force.

The only special idea I have for the Guardians, who will be an intellectual, physical and moral elite modeled on elite white protective forces through history, is that we do a formal, ritual blood sacrifice, annually, with the victim drawn by lottery from the names of everybody who receives money to be part of the protective elite. This is one way to help protect against corruption, since there will be a small but real risk of losing your life; helping to ensure that people join the Guardians for the right motive (of course they will also have to pre-prove their qualifications on the moral, intellectual and physical fronts).

I’m open to discussions on how the federal/national government umbrella racial defense would be paid for. I’m open to the scope of the definition of racial protection.

Anyway, that’s my nutshell idea for how we arrange things

AFTER WE HAVE WON THE REVOLUTION AND HAVE RESTORED WHITE POLITICAL SOVEREIGNTY AND INDEPENDENCE IN SOME PARTICULAR SPACE.

My ideas about the earlier part – how we go from where we are today to regaining that power, are expressed in 2-3 threads in the Strategy section. They amount to polarizing America between WN and jews, and fighting it out. Achieving that polarization by first destroying our competitors on the right, the professional conservatives.

[ The above is from a forum thread posting. ]

What is needed

By Alex Linder

What is needed is an elite political group. Organizational forms – that’s a technical question. It’s a known subject, highly studied, analysis available to all. Solutions independent of the contents and mission of the organization in question. The harder, the more rigorous the organization is, the more respect it will garner from average people. Despite decades of maceration in jewish anti-culture in which the bottom is artificially and politically placed on top, all Aryans, south and north, east and west, instinctively respect what is better over what is worse. But elite is not just something you mouth, you actually have to behave that way. The group must pick the right principles, and standards, and it must live up to them as well as anything made of humans can. The idea of a world in which our race is self-conscious and strong in self-defense and expansion is as attractive to white men as any other ideal. I mean, christ. If you can sell average people the crap that the jebus cult proffers, imagine what a quality product would do. And I can’t stress this enough – both of our competitors know this. The jews hate ‘nazis’ – German for racially aware White men – the most hated demons in their anti-pantheon. More subtly, the catholics, as I’ve discussed in the case of E. Michael Jones, also hate race-focused Whites, as manifest in their words, often lies (taken bodily from jewish commies the church is otherwise at odds with), about the German nationalists. Why do these parties hate and fear racially aware white men? Because the jews know that one of the few ways they can be defeated is by race-conscious white men. And the catholics know that the standing model of a race-based community is inherently, undeniably and insuperably preferable to any society their shitty cult can create.

The proof of my assertions isn’t needed. What I say is self-evident – to anyone who can think. But to make a memorable of it, as I’ve said, just imagine what would happen if one American state were made Whites only. No other races.

Biggest population rush in human history. Imagine a Wyoming, a windy, woebone state for non-elkic creatures, filled with 100 million people. It would happen quicker than you could believe.

What was it the guy said in the movie? “You’re money, man, and you don’t even know it.” I dont know if he was joking, but unjokingly that applies to our cause perfectly. That’s why both our enemies, the jews and the christian delusives, refer to us as immoral haters. Because we’re not. Because what we have to offer is infinitely better than what they have. And they know it. That’s why they’re so hot to suppress it.

[ The above is from a forum thread posting. ]

I’m not a Nazi

By Alex Linder

The swastika can’t be falsified into pro-jew, but it can be worn falsely by jews (see Frank Collins), and it is also associated with Nazism. I don’t wear a swastika because I’m not a Nazi. There’s also the problem that most people, including most declared Nazis, do not understand what Nazism is. I’d include myself among that number. The reason for this is that a very good deal of bad or misleading information out there hides what NS [National Socialism] actually is. I’ve tried to clear this up lower down on the forum. It’s complicated by the fact that the junkmedia call anyone who criticizes jews, much less those, like me, who make a main point of it, “Nazis,” even if those people, like me, aren’t Nazis.

I don’t agree with an all-powerful central state. I support, as I’ve written lower on forum, in a monofunctional overstate focused on defending the race, defined as broadly as needed. Beneath that racial umbrella, I believe in decentralization. Hitler did most emphatically not believe in decentralization.

Just as jews routinely mislabel me a Nazi, WN [white nationalist] enemies routinely mislabel me a libertarian. I don’t know what to do other than simply continue to make the case for the arrangement I think best. I don’t have a cool symbol. Personally I don’t like jewelry and symbols of any sort. Of course one is needed at some point, but that point is not now.

What is needed, so far as WN put forward a positive vision, rather than a critique of AmeriKwa, a ZOG production, is, in my opinion, to stress that our solution is the only one in which you have the independence that befits a white man, and you can exercise your whitemaniacal creativity and intelligence in the white context most suited to its flourishing.

Imagine a country in which you could be both white and a man. Under ZOG, you can be neither white nor a man. Under NS you can be white but not a man. Under libertarianism you can be a man but not white.

I want to be both white and a man, and I think about half of WN feel the same way I do; the rest are either outright NS or social-democrats (European type) or welfare-statists (American type).

Men can agree that we need all-White nations without agreeing on the scope and role of the government within that all-White nation. This is fairly obvious, that there’s no agreement on the deeper how-we-live-together stuff, that there’s a basic split, but it gets confused because so many WN come from conservatism and essentially just add race to their politics, leading outsiders and insiders alike to think that WN is just another petty party political option on the democratic-electoral menu rather than a fundamentally different and all-orienting worldview. Which is why I’ve insisted against all others, basically, that our practical political goal in this period ought to be attacking conservatives and replacing them in the eyes of the people rather than mixing with them and trying to influence them as MacDonald and James Edwards do.

My view is that altho KM and Edwards call themselves (as far as I know) White Nationalists, or at least don’t mind being called that, they are better viewed as implicit conservatives (IC). Because functionally that’s just what they are—conservatives. Their mindset is defending/appealing, not attacking and attracting. While many of the ICs’ positions overlap with WN/NS, the mindset is completely different. I see them as simply repeating failure patterns of the past without ever putting any conscious thought to why the Lindbergh on their party actually failed.

Back to my own view, WhiteMania, WhiteManistand, whatever you want to call it…

In the setup I describe, no one is free to question or undermine the racial basis of the state—if they don’t agree to it, they leave. If they feel they can only be men by living amid third worlders, they have either fought to prevent the birth of our new state, been killed, or fled abroad. If any of these are left after Whites take power, they will be dealt with in one way or another, but in no way will anyone ideologically opposed to the racial basis of the new states be allowed to remain within it.

Race is not a matter that can be compromised, but it is a matter worth killing over. The same goes for Catholics, or other goddists. If their religious weltanschauung demands race mixing, or race-neutralism at all levels, and they are actively going to teach and incite on that demand, then they too will be forced out of the new state. If they can live within the confines of the new founding on an explicit racial basis, then perhaps they can set up a neo-Maryland microstate for their type beneath the umbrella. But it must be absolutely clear that absolutely no political opposition to the basis of the new state will be tolerated. And if it is discovered, the leaders will be executed and the followers expelled or executed. Call it sicut catholicus non.

Beneath that federal level—the collective racial defense umbrella—white men may group themselves as they like, and build such subcommunities as they see fit. They could be welfare-statists, they could be libertarians. They could be 1001 other things I can’t imagine. But they will be responsible for building their own intermediate institutions if they feel they need them. In this way their freedom, honor, need to assume responsibility and manliness are preserved. The central state provides the drainage: keeping anti-White shit on the other side of the borders and out of the streets. The dreams are the responsibility of the men themselves.

To me, what I describe is both possible and desirable. I fancy it is hard where needs hard, and loose where needs freedom. It takes into account both racial laws and economic laws. For the great truth of our time, which has not yet been realized in minds and matter, is that the state is outmoded for nearly all, if not all, purposes. That means the state is the worst way of accomplishing almost any given task. I recommend WN take some time to educate themselves in the limits of politics (read Burke, Kirk, and other classic conservative thinkers) and get up to speed on the latest triumphs made through private, voluntary arrangements (read lewrockwell.com). And then you’ve got VNNF for tying it all together through the insights of the best racialists on the ‘net. Or at least a few dozen good smart white men on the same page seeking the same basic thing.

One counter view to mine is that genuine National Socialism has all the answers any white men need (adapted to their particular nation and circumstances), and we should simply don the swastika with pride and make our way forward.

I don’t agree with that view, which I take to be the view of NSM [NS movement], but it is psychologically right and strong, whereas the whining, remonstrating, complaining approach of, for example, the A3P [American Third Party] ICs is psychologically wrong and weak—mere conservatism with a racial veneer.

That sums up my position. I don’t wear swastika because I’m not a National Socialist. If I were a NS, I would wear it. I’m not NS because I don’t believe the government should be running White men like children. I don’t believe White men need public schools, socialized health care, or anything but collective racial defense out of their central government.

[ The above is from a blog posting. ]

On White state to be, White cause and one tendency

By Alex Linder

A man is both a man, an individual, and a member of a larger group, perhaps a number of them. What the jews have done is see to it that the white man has no loyalty to either, so far as jews can enforce it. They have done all they could to reduce his power over his own family, and his ability to define his community. All that’s left to him is promiscuous sex, sports fanage, and voting for one of the two wings of the governing party. If he’s bothered by this, he can sit in a jail cell, or attend a church whose priestophile agrees with the government on the essentials – it’s sort of a third political party to the Republicans and Democrats, catering to spiritual needs.

This isn’t good enough. Our cause must be not abstractions and universals like the traditional christ cultist and neo-christians known as secular humanists favor, but a world and nation in which the white man can be and live as a man, individually, and a White, socially. So both his individual and his communal beings are satisfied. Then his material and spiritual needs are met in a way that fits and satisfies his nature.

What needs to be done to make our cause more attractive to our people is to stimulate their imagination in relation to race. Satisfy their spiritual needs by showing them their place in the race called Qwest. The thrilling, ongoing adventure story of the development of our race, involving chance, heroism, luck, and all the rest is more thrilling than the lugubrious lies around the semitic science-fiction character jesus. A White focus on strength, I believe will spiritually defeat christ-insanity – THIS is the main takeaway of the NS experience. Nearly all the top NS were ex-Catholics. That shows you that they knew in their bones and brains and found through experience that Catholicism does not have what it takes, and is not enough – not enough to protect, create or even imagine a society worth living in. They eclipsed it. The NS eclipsed Catholic society – and the priests know it. The E. Michael Joneses know it. That is why they fear it, and that is why they lie about it. For example, EMJ repeating lies out of the Pink Swastika he had to know were false. A serious man like Jones wouldn’t do that except for a very deep reason. Jones breaks his own commandment when it comes to the NS. Out of fear. He knows NS has something better than his church has. He also knows that if Whites get back in control of society as briefly happened in ’30s Germany, his church will fade like the dodo.

You know what’s the most unChristian creature on god’s green earth?

A white baby.

A masculine society focused on strength, justice and independence will make the church, with its focus on love, mercy, and weakness, considerably less attractive, especially as people observe its undeniable well-orderedness.

Those protecting the racial basis of the state, the Guardians, will, as part of their job, maintain an Aryan Academy, where all the high virtues, techniques, knowledge relating to racial science are mastered and passed on. It bears thinking on the scope and form of these groups – and I’m open to suggestions. How do we, institutionally, protect a racially based state? The racial protection of the state will be the only function of the over-government. Do we have any systematic thinkers on VNNForum? How would you define and divide up and institutionalize the Guardians as the over-government? What is racial defense of the state? Does it touch as widely as economics and public health? Or not?

Much as I detest speculative writing about things-to-be, since it’s so easily wrong, people have said it should be done, and I think they’re right. It helps people imagine something other than what is. A very large part of what we deride as lemminghood is simply lack of imagination. People think what is must be. Because they don’t know anything else, and they can’t imagine anything else. Someone else must put ideas in their minds; they won’t spontaneously generate otherwise. Once they can see, it begins to become real to them.

[ The above is from a forum thread posting. ]

On White Nationalism

By Alex Linder

“It is fear, above all else, that we must overcome, in ourselves and in our people, if we are to regain sovereignty.”

Our cause isn’t truly a political position but a species-representation – we are a biological party, not a political party. White society by default, on a far deeper level than mere petty politics, is what white nationalism represents. It’s not a religious thing either, because whites were white before they were ever christians, and they’ll continue to be white longer after that happy day when the sick cult passes out of existence. In the sense that matters, we can’t NOT represent our race. So we hardly need to appeal to people because we are identical with the people and their true interests. We aren’t representing or appealing, we are the thing itself – the thing itself defending itself, in the biosphere, of which the formal legal electoral system is but a subcircle. If you need evidence that whites are already with us Whites, it’s that on the deep life decisions, who to marry, where to live, whites choose white the vast majority of the time. Their race does matter to them, no matter how they compress the air coming out of their throats. We don’t need to appeal to anybody, we not only represent them already, we are them and cannot not be them. We’re just open about it. THAT is the only real difference between us and the vast majority of fellow whites: we are open about it. But, back on the petty party political level, what Haller doesn’t get is that the type of ‘appeal’ conservatives like him never even think to question as necessary is not where it’s at at all. The reason people don’t join their formal political behavior with their informal unspoken feelings and behavior is fear. The jews have divorced our external from our internal by means of fear. It is fear, above all else, that we must overcome, in ourselves and in our people, if we are to regain sovereignty.

Only bravery gets out fear. We don’t need to appeal to people, Leon. We need to LEAD them. Lead them means not making arguments that people already believe in but, at this point, not showing fear, and striking back at the enemy, verbally and, if we have the guts, like Breivik did, physically. Haller, what you conservatives don’t understand is what I wrote above. If we’re just another set of whores and panderers, we haven’t a hope. The System can always offer more carrots and sticks. We have to be about what our people need. We must attract them with our strength, not our wimpy sales pitch. What have we to offer in the brummagem democratic way? Not a fucking thing. I mean, of course we do, but that aint the fucking point. You’re cheapening and superficializing our cause by acting like we’re just another variation of Republicans or Democrats. “Vote for me and I’ll steal you 5% more from Pete than Bill will.” Hunh-uh. We’re the whole thing. Not a party position or platform. People will only join us when they see 1) we are not afraid (like the cowardly conservatives and Republicans) and that 2) we strike real blows against the enemy, which indicates we have a chance to actually win. Not just lose, get beat up, and go ever backward. How do we demonstrate the strength that eventually our coracials will accept as leadership? It starts verbally by using slurs. This is where you and MacDonald and Parrott and Yggdrasil and the rest are 100% wrong. Slurs show we will not be intimidated by System verbal taboos. Which is the prerequisite for showing that, in time, we will get to where we can ignore their other rules for whitemice as well. Truly, the continental verbal-political-strategic divide is the use of the term nigger. If you won’t use it under your real name, you are not involved in serious politics. You are merely a conservative. Either use ‘nigger’ or be a niggler, to make a phrase of it.

We gotta be gross large powerful and scary as all fuck, Haller, like a great white shark maw coming up out of the water at the slick black jewmud-seal. Not bending backward appealing to dicks in Dockers.

A man is both a man, an individual, and a member of a larger group, perhaps a number of them. What the jews have done is see to it that the white man has no loyalty to either, so far as jews can enforce it. They have done all they could to reduce his power over his own family, and his ability to define his community. All that’s left to him is promiscuous sex, sports fanage, and voting for one of the two wings of the governing party. If he’s bothered by this, he can sit in a jail cell, or attend a church whose priestophile agrees with the government on the essentials – it’s sort of a third political party to the Republicans and Democrats, catering to spiritual needs.

This isn’t good enough. Our cause must be not abstractions and universals like the traditional christ cultist and neo-christians known as secular humanists favor, but a world and nation in which the white man can be and live as a man, individually, and a White, socially. So both his individual and his communal beings are satisfied. Then his material and spiritual needs are met in a way that fits and satisfies his nature.

What needs to be done to make our cause more attractive to our people is to stimulate their imagination in relation to race. Satisfy their spiritual needs by showing them their place in the race called Qwest. The thrilling, ongoing adventure story of the development of our race, involving chance, heroism, luck, and all the rest is more thrilling than the lugubrious lies around the semitic science-fiction character jesus. A White focus on strength, I believe will spiritually defeat christ-insanity – THIS is the main takeaway of the NS experience. Nearly all the top NS were ex-Catholics. That shows you that they knew in their bones and brains and found through experience that Catholicism does not have what it takes, and is not enough – not enough to protect, create or even imagine a society worth living in. They eclipsed it. The NS eclipsed Catholic society – and the priests know it. The E. Michael Joneses know it. That is why they fear it, and that is why they lie about it. For example, EMJ repeating lies out of the Pink Swastika he had to know were false. A serious man like Jones wouldn’t do that except for a very deep reason. Jones breaks his own commandment when it comes to the NS. Out of fear. He knows NS has something better than his church has. He also knows that if Whites get back in control of society as briefly happened in ’30s Germany, his church will fade like the dodo.

You know what’s the most unChristian creature on god’s green earth?

A white baby.

A masculine society focused on strength, justice and independence will make the church, with its focus on love, mercy, and weakness, considerably less attractive, especially as people observe its undeniable well-orderedness.

What is needed, so far as WN put forward a positive vision, rather than a critique of AmeriKwa, a ZOG production, is, in my opinion, is to stress that our solution is the only one in which you have the independence that befits a white MAN, and you can exercise your whitemaniacal creativity and intelligence in the WHITE context most suited to its flourishing. Imagine a country in which you could be both WHITE and a MAN. Under ZOG, you can be neither WHITE nor a MAN. Under NS you can be WHITE but not a man. Under libertarianism you can be a MAN but not WHITE. I want to be both WHITE and a MAN, and I think about half of WN feel the same way I do; the rest are either outright NS or social-democrats (European type) or welfare-statists (American type). Men can agree that we need all-White nations without agreeing on the scope and role of the government within that all-White nation. This is fairly obvious, that there’s no agreement on the deeper how-we-live-together stuff, that there’s a basic split, but it gets confused because so many WN come from conservatism and essentially just add race to their politics. Leading outsiders and insiders alike to think that WN is just another petty party political option on the democratic-electoral menu rather than a fundamentally different and all-orienting worldview. Which is why I’ve insisted against all others, basically, that our practical political goal in this period ought to be attacking conservatives and replacing them in the eyes of the people rather than mixing with them and trying to influence them as MacDonald and James Edwards do. My view is that altho KM and Edwards call themselves (as far as I know) White Nationalists, or at least don’t mind being called that, they are better viewed as implicit conservatives (IC). Because functionally that’s just what they are – conservatives. Their mindset is defending/appealing, not attacking and attracting. While many of the ICs’ positions overlap with WN/NS, the mindset is completely different. I see them as simply repeating failure patterns of the past without ever putting any conscious thought to why the Lindbergh on their party actually failed.

Back to my own view, WhiteMania, WhiteManistand, whatever you want to call it… In the setup I describe, no one is free to question or undermine the racial basis of the state – if they don’t agree to it, they leave. If they feel they can only be men by living amud third worlders, they have either fought to prevent the birth of our new state, been killed, or fled abroad. If any of these are left after Whites take power, they will be dealt with in one way or another, but in no way will anyone ideologically opposed to the racial basis of the new states be allowed to remain within it. Race is NOT a matter that can be compromised, but it IS a matter worth killing over. The same goes for Catholics, or other goddists. If their religious weltanschauung demands race mixing, or race-neutralism at all levels, and they are actively going to teach and incite on that demand, then they too will be forced out of the new state. If they can live within the confines of the new founding on an explicit racial basis, then perhaps they can set up a neo-Maryland microstate for their type beneath the umbrella. But it must be absolutely clear that absolutely no political opposition to the basis of the new state will be tolerated. And if it is discovered, the leaders will be executed and the followers expelled or executed. Call it sicut catholicus non.

Beneath that federal level — the collective racial defense umbrella — white MEN may group themselves as they like, and build such subcommunities as they see fit. They could be welfare-statists, they could be libertarians. They could be 1001 other things I can’t imagine. But they will be responsible for building their own intermediate institutions if they feel they need them. In this way their freedom, honor, need to assume responsibility and manliness are preserved. The central state provides the drainage – keeping anti-White shit on the other side of the borders and out of the streets. The dreams are the responsibility of the men themselves.

To me, what I describe is both possible and desirable. I fancy it is hard where needs hard, and loose where needs freedom. It takes into account both racial laws AND economic laws. For the great truth of our time, which has not yet been realized in minds and matter, is that the state is outmoded for nearly all, if not all, purposes. That means the state is the worst way of accomplishing almost any given task. I recommend WN take some time to educate themselves in the LIMITS of politics (read Burke, Kirk, and other classic conservative thinkers) and get up to speed on the latest triumphs made through private, voluntary arrangements (read lewrockwell.com). And then you’ve got VNNF for tying it all together through the insights of the best racialists on the ‘net. Or at least a few dozen good smart white men on the same page seeking the same basic thing.

One counter view to mine is that genuine National Socialism has all the answers any white men need (adapted to their particular nation and circumstances), and we should simply don the swastika with pride and make our way forward.

I don’t agree with that view, which I take to be the view of NSM, but it is psychologically right and strong, whereas the whining, remonstrating, complaining approach of, for example, the A3P ICs is psychologically wrong and weak – mere conservatism with a racial veneer.

That sums up my position. I don’t wear swastika because I’m not a National Socialist. If I were a NS, I would wear it. I’m not NS because I don’t believe the government should be running White men like children. I don’t believe White men need public schools, socialized health care, or anything but collective racial defense out of their central government.

[ The above is from a forum thread posting. ]

White Virtues, White Vices

By Alex Linder

Article in NYT about the marrige of a nunish anti-chick. She’s a Berrigan. You might remember that name from the ’60s. Big anti-war name, a Catholic, or ex-Catholic, liberal trying to end Vietnam and everything else wrong with the world. This plainstress, Frida, is his daughter. What’s notable here is the striking Whiteness of both the way the woman lives, for both good and bad. She has that monkish ability to live solidly for a cause, yet that misdirected spirit that leads her to devote her time and substantial brainpower to the service of something destructive. So many whites are like this, it’s really sad that something as insane, factually baseless, and utterly destructive as christ-insanity managed to become the main spiritual channel for our race over the last two millennia of our existence. It is a genuine tragedy that Christ-lunacy became common in White lands. Seeking a contemplative place, she signed up to work and live in the Lower East Side headquarters of the Catholic Worker Movement, whose mission is to help the poor and homeless. Ms. Berrigan’s bedroom there was so small, it could not fit a bed, only a sleeping bag. “No bed bugs!” she said cheerily. She cooked and served lunch to the homeless, and provided them with everything from fresh clothes to long conversations. Ms. Berrigan has bright blue eyes that rarely dart around when she is in conversation. Although she often discusses serious topics — banning nuclear weapons, the conditions at prison camps — she has a way of treading across them very lightly, like a deer. So we see that Berrigan is a serious woman, what with her steady gaze, and her christlike devotion to helping the poor. But helping scum is not a worthwhile occupation, as worthwhile as it undoubtedly can be to place something other than money-seeking as the prime object of ones life. And the fact that one is serious does not mean one isn’t a fool, isn’t wrong, isn’t delusional, isn’t to be mocked and laughed at. It’s a racial-cultural flaw that Whites possess in spades, the inability to distinguish between what is actually serious and the outward appearance. Jews say, goyim are polite to one another because they can’t tell if they’re being screwed. Ie, they’re dumb. Another way of hitting at roughly the same idea is the saying, you can fake being serious, but you can’t fake being funny. What a sad and terrible thing it is that such a large portion of the White mental elite believe helping worthless scumbags is nobler than doing something useful. Only christ-insanity could have led these people to make such a mistake. Christ-insanity and liberalism are often opposed, as are Christ-insanity and the so-called Enlightenment. But in fact, they are two extremely similar versions of the same thing. They’re both wrong, and they both suck. … Lots of inadvertent humor in this piece, too: The couple had their first real date on Valentine’s Day 2010. They went to Brooklyn Bowl in Williamsburg, but mostly talked. “She’s smart, she knows herself, she has a ridiculous vocabulary,” he said. “She can out-talk most people in any debate simply by using words no one else can understand.” Is that how debates are won? By using words “no one else” can understand? Sounds like her “long conversations” with hobos are starting to rub off on her, you ask me. This is good, though: ““From very early on,” she said, “I would look at him and think: This is someone I want a family with. This is a person I want to grow old with. This is the person I want to struggle with.”
After four months of dating, he formally proposed to her in his own informal way. “I said, ‘I don’t have a ring, I don’t have a plan, but I want to marry you,’ ” he remembered.
She recalled: “I said yes because Patrick makes me feel really happy and safe and inspired all at the same time. I said yes because I learn a lot from him, and not just about the Red Sox.”She also said yes because he never tried to take her out to big fancy dinners or buy her expensive things. “Part of our vows to one another is wanting freedom, and part of being free is living simply and not being encumbered by stuff,” said Ms. Berrigan, who moved in with Mr. Sheehan-Gaumer last November. “That is something I learned from my family. You really don’t need a lot of stuff to be happy.”
Most Americans never figure that out. To most Americans, accumulating money is the number-one goal of life, practically its only meaning. They really do believe that any philosophy that doesn’t worship, respect and seek money is a form of hippiedom. Well, in fact, they don’t actually believe that anybody doesn’t share their view. They simply can’t make sense of anybody who looks at life the way la Berrigan does. Protestants in particular, even more than Catholics, have tended to see material success as proof of God’s blessing, hence been double-hot to achieve it, at least that’s the theory among certain sociologists. It’s sad that so many people make what niggers call the paper caper the be-all and end-all; but it’s also sad that among those who reject that central purpose such a large percentage opts for something even worse: helping shitbags. Most so-called homeless people are drunks, druggies or crazies. Really, very little can be done about it. What if even merely 100 women nationwide with the character and brains of a Berrigan devoted their substantial energies toward creating a curriculum tailored to the needs of our race’s children? Isn’t that a more beautiful, logical, practical, and useful way to spend one’s time than helping crazy hobos or unelevatable colored sprogs? Even the anti-acquisitive are merely the photo-negative of the dollar chasers. If they’re going to help life’s losers, by god, they’re going to help the loseriest losers they can dig out of the swamp beneath the barrel. That means niggers and assorted third-world scum. It never means doing something MODEST and practical that the WORLD (by world, I mean jewish mass media) celebrates: helping people who can actually use the help; people, young whites, whose lives will result in a multiplier-effect return for the effort bestowed on them. Whereas the sullen sepia sprogs will require help their whole lives long. Unlike even animals, helped niggers will never even be able to be released safely and successfully back into the wild. I guess it falls under Lenin’s ‘the best way to control the opposition is to lead it,’ and that goes for life patterns too. The main life pattern is money acquisition, but the main ALTERNATIVE life pattern is set by the same people: helping useless, destructive, sociocidal coloreds. Verily I say unto you demi-nitwits: there is another way. Nay, there be many other ways.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/17/fa…20%20%20ed=all

[ The above is from a blog posting. ]

On hiking Grand Canyon

By Alex Linder

I have to recount an anecdote. Indulge me, if you will.

The hardest thing I ever did physically was a spur-of-the-moment 12-13 miles hike down and back up the Grand Canyon on a hot summer afternoon to midnight. Why did I do it? Because it seemed very DIFFICULT and I was healthy at that point, and felt up for a nice challenge. I never need much water, as a kid I used to play sports all day and would pride myself on being the last one to drink. (As a side note, my behavior is common enough the park rangers know it as a phenomenon. It’s kind of a masculine pride thing, and people sometimes die from it, or get exhausted/lost/left panting on the trail after the park closes and the sun goes down, leading their gf’s to scream and shriek. The rangers have no sympathy for those who do this sort of thing, and they might even charge these people if they have to drag out the machinery to look for/rescue them. Anyhoot…)

I can’t remember what trail this was, and I’m not going to look it up, but what it is is a trail from the bus drop off about six miles down to the river, and of course the same distance back, uphill. It’s cool on the rim of the canyon. But as you are warned, and is in fact the case, you lose the winds down below the rim, and it quickly becomes extremely hot in the sun of a summer day where the temp is over 100 and the air is dead.

So, I set off down the trail, with only a one-liter bottle of water. I figured I would drink the river when I got there. Yeah, six miles is a bit, but it’s downhill, nothing to worry about. Once I got maybe 2+ miles down the trail, past the point where the tourists have turned back to return to the rim and the bus and their cars, you only see an occasional serious hiker. Who is almost always carrying a big pack and a shit-tonne of water. And here’s me in a mesh wife-beater with a lone bottle of water. An Italian (I guess) was horrified by what I had, and seemed to believe I was bound to die of dehydration. I later crossed another guy with a big pack who seemed to have at least two full gallons of water on his person. I was staggered by the weight he was carrying. Surely the fluid lost thru the sweat of carrying a full GALLON of water would more than make up for the value of its hydration. At least it sure seemed to me. I didn’t speak to him, just nodded and observed his accoutrements. These trails are all over the place; you can walk wherever you want, and there are a number of paths back up from the river to rim, or you can walk along the river and explore.

So, I made it down to the river, and goddam, it was hotter and harder on the way DOWN than I had ever guessed. I mean, I was flat fucking tired, truly sun-whipped from the extreme heat and glare. I sat down on the bank, half in the river, and drank a bunch of river water, which they advise against. It tasted damn good. The Colorado is remarkably cold and fast-rushing compared to your milder eastern rivers. You could very easily drown in it. I was in no danger of that, just sitting in the enjoyable cold water and drinking it, throwing it on my face and body repeatedly. Oh man, how nice. And it’s pretty scenic too. They have a mesh metal crossbridge where you can pass over and walk around and see a little cabin. Somewhere around there you can even camp for the nite. So I looked around, and then walked back over the river, and back on the even trail that jagged along with the river course, with no real end in sight.

At this point, altho refreshed, I was still extremely tired from a mere six miles…downhill…in extreme heat…with no wind. I was not at all eager to head back up. And the sun was within, say, two hours of going down. At this point I realized that my projection to my girlfriend that I would be back in 4-5 hours max was risibily ridiculous. I was that far in and had the entire, much harder trek back UP in the same horrible heat, and very much more tired out than I had started.

The point of this little story was that I passed this Glen Ellyn-type girl (that means upper-middle-class WASP type) just as I hit the river. Hers was the antithesis of my approach. She had the high-priced backpack, with the little gerbil suck thing that comes over your shoulder. I had rubbed mud on my face from the river, just to keep a little cool on my head, and to be accurate, to make for a little crazy visual effect. We stopped and spoke just briefly. I said, Actually I’m not really thirsty at all. She quickly returned, actually that’s not such a good thing. Goody litte her knows off some Sheet provided by Legitimate Authority that whatever I was saying was one of the starter signs of advanced dessication. Undoubtedly it was something like that. Well, you know women. Many, many of them don’t understand anything that matters – they’re women. Their mind-heart-soul complex vests in Authority, and its high altar command that we be Doing Things the Right Way. WASP upper middle class women tend to lack spirit and love of freedom; they have no visceral understanding of anything that isn’t coded up by authority – anything they would deem ‘inappropriate,’ one of the highest of their verbal holies. And the high intelligence they often exhibit merely reinforces their inner dessication. Just the uber slight snootyishness with which she good-doggily alluded to what All Morally Upright People Know About Hydration, and the way she just barely drew back because of my mud smear and, by her class’ way of thinking, slightly too loud or too spirited, or in some tiny degree wrong way of interacting with her, like I was going to dirty her with my dehydrated corporeal anti-authoritarian indecency…just – it’s the doting in this anecdote. That’s just how this type is. You can’t explain it to them. “I wanted to run down this anti-mountain and run a real physical risk just BECAUSE it’s that – a risk. It’s not insane. It’s a legitimately risk-taking activity, and I need to prove that I’m tough enough that I deserve to edit VNN, have kids, do whatever I need to do in life.” Women cannot understand this impulse, and that is one reason civilized societies don’t allow them to make the deepest political decisions.

Now, lots of people write stuff near in form to what I’ve written, but it always ends in celebrating rebellious for its own sake, or some bogus spirituality, or proles over bourgeois, but that’s not what I mean here. I merely mean to show that this girl’s type is deeply uncomprehending of the spiritual need to make your own way, and not rely on authority at all times. Sometimes not only to go off the track, but to commit literally illegal criminal acts, even if small ones. What these girl-mindeds never get is that while they are perfectly happy doing something that has been cleaned and sanitized and routinized by 10,000,000 before them…there’s nothing wrong with trying to get a tiny piece of how things were before all that, which is all I was trying to do. I think their judgment says more about them than the ones they judge. I mean, they really think you are nuts because you’re not carrying literally gallons of water, and you don’t have an Officially Approved Hiker’s Backpack. I don’t think girls like this are nuts, I think they’re kind of sad and unimaginative. They’re spiritually dried up like they’ve taken a suppository of the spirit. Fuck your stupid $200 backpack, and your gerbil suck, and your sheet-says volume of water, and your appropriately constrained expression of distaste for anyone who deviates an inch from what Authority has delivered about hiking from on high.

And that’s my story. I can say the hike back up that inverted mountain was the hardest physical thing I’ve ever done, truly and genuinely exhausting. The heat finally left when the sun went down. There were no lights, and the wind came up. It was actually getting nipply. I only passed one other set of persons on the trail, and they asked if I needed them to call emergency. I said no. I knew I could do it, but it ended up taking me past midnight. Multiple times I had to lie down in the trail and rest. I was a little afraid of being butted off the mountainside by a goat, but that’s the kind of extremely unlikely thing you think about when you’re tired in a strange land in the dark with the stars out and wind picking up. Finally I made it to the top, and my gf was of course nowhere around. I wasn’t sure what to do, as the park was shut down. I decided to jump in the dumpster of aluminum cans, since I was cold. I started thinking, trying to remember where the cars were, which way the bus had taken us. I hate just waiting, so I picked a direction and went with it, and another 1.5 miles, as I recall, and sure enough, I found the main parking place and eventually my car, with my gf inside.

She had gone to the park rangers, and the feminist there said what I said above – that my actions were typical of the behavior of a sector of the male population. And, according to the gf, she seemed awfully like it would be no big loss to her, and perhaps even a modest pleasure, if I were to die in the Canyon. Well, you can see it from her point of view too, I suppose, and I was never in danger of dying unless that goat came along, or a mountain lion. I was just bone weary.

But the real reason I did it was not just that I wanted a challenge, it was that these goddam national parks now jew you for $20 to get in and look around, and I, jewily enough, wanted to get my full $20 bucks worth of experience, and the Griswold rim railing rubbernecking wasn’t enough to satisfy me.

If you’re ever at the Canyon, you might give it a try yourself. Contrary to government reports, there’s nothing wrong with drinking out of the Colorado river, and you don’t need to carry fifteen gallons of water and a giant backpack to get down there and back. But it is a goddam hard thing to walk all that trail and back in a single day. I would say I did about 15 miles total, from a standing start, with no equipment and a single water bottle. Thirst was never a problem, but the trip was absolutely exhausting, and I felt it in my muscles even two weeks later, and it took 3-4x as long as I estimated it would. THE END.

[ The above is from a forum thread posting. ]

On good jews/bad jews, making distictions between jews

By Alex Linder

Think about this slowly, there’s great meaning in it.

You never see jewish behavior discussed as a cause of attitudes toward them. That behavior rather obviously explains 100% of the hostility, but it’s NEVER discussed as a cause, except here in the underground.

Ok, easily enough explained by the fact that jews dominate the mass media in Whiteworld.

But…how do they get all jews, the millions of jew columnists and talking heads, on the same page? Many of those jews have fuck-you money, and could say whatever the hell they wanted, no matter what their fellow MOTs (members of tribe) said.

Ever think about that?

Jews are shaped sort of like people, but they are not like us at all.

Same logic can be applied to ‘the’ ‘holocaust.’ Lots of jews went through German labor camps, where we know there was no gassing taking place. But almost literally not a single jew will tell the simple truth about this. And you can find thousands of jews who will repeat the most obviously brazen and ridiculous lies.

Again, this fact shows that this race is radically different from our own. Very, very profoundly different, an entirely different species.

Treating jews as individuals, which traces ultimately to the christ cult, with it’s focus on the individual soul, is a genocidal mistake on our part. Yet even many of our thought-leaders (we have no real leaders at present) make this mistake. They are illogically and dangerously given to making distinctions between jews, but as the record shows, the only way to treat jews is as an absolutely undifferentiated block of hostile aliens.

Look at it a different way, the way I always advise: what do the winners do? Can we, should we, copy it? Are jews winners, or are whites (small w)? Well, do jews dictate to Whites? or whites to jews? Do whites kiss jews’ ass? Or do jews kiss white ass? Do whites pour money into jewistan and make excuses for it? Or do jews pour money into Whitelandia and make laws to help it? The answers are obvious: by any index, jews are political winners, and whites are political losers.

So how do the winners treat the losers? Do they make distinctions between them? Or do they call them all goyim, farm animals, shiksas, whores, shaigetz, unclean beasts? If the losers show any sign of waking or acting up, do they respond to their arguments, or immediately label them nazis?

You know the answer. The question is why anybody, let alone the intelligent thought-leaders on our side, make any distinction between jews. That’s not the logical way to go, and it’s not what winners do. So QUIT DOING IT.

THERE ARE NO GOOD JEWS.

and..

NO WAY OUT BUT THROUGH THE JEWS.

[ The above is from a forum thread posting. ]