It and Essence

By Alex Linder

[ The following is from a forum thread posting. ]

Uh, actually it does, if it’s the reason you come out on top. Again, I suggest you educate yourself out into a marginally less ignorant state by looking up the definition of aristocracy rather than challenging me.

Both times they failed. That’s what interests me. It is not what interests Southerners like you. Praise your grandpappy all you want, it doesn’t mean anything to me one way or another. Personally, if I were Southern, I’d be most concerned with how a people who had the better of the argument – intellectually, legally, and morally — and the better physical/material position — needing only to hold on until the North gave up — manage to lose every single time. It seems to speak to a defective culture. I’m identifying precisely what those defects consist in, which is a task that doesn’t interest any Southerner I’ve ever heard of. That’s why the only hope for our race in America comes from outside the South.

Jefferson was a Southerner, and he was as much an Enlightenment fantasist as any of them. The problem lies more in religion than anything. Christ-lunacy and Enlightenment fantasy are different versions of the same mistake. It is necessary to perceive a problem, or perceive a problem correctly, before one can solve the problem. Christ-insanity precludes accurate perception. It is a cultural failure with biological implications.

It’s not the fact of the defeat that matters or interests, it’s the reaction to the defeat, the reasons for the defeat. You ever notice that Germans, NS Germans, defeated in WWII, do not react the way Southerners do to their people’s defeat. Side point: Northerners aren’t a people except to Southerners. No one in the North ever calls himself a Northerner. What ought to interest Southerners but very emphatically does not interest them, apart from fun but irrelevant military rehashings, is why the South lost. The South is too God-addled to take a clear view of the meaning of its history of losing to smarter outsiders.

It is my oft-stated view that the religious crankery of the top Southerners, aped and emulated by the dirt eating base of the demographic pyramid, is primary reason the South lost. The cult of the ‘noble, honorable’ christ-man, jes’ doin’ he duty, etc etc, lives right on today, to the exclusion of all interest in what precisely it would take to defeat the judeo-North. Southerners have no interest in any other people but themselves. They hate the enemy, but they don’t even define it or understand it. Thus they repeat their actions, which are mistakes, and get the same bitter yield. Worse than this, 99% aren’t even aware of this, and cannot be made aware of it by having it pointed out to them. They just want to bleat and repeat ad infinitum. It’s what they’re capable of. And the kicker is that their top dogs believed that God determines all outcomes, both of causes and individual lives. Therefore, God held it just that the South was defeated. So why bother wondering whether different actions, different politics, different ways of behaving, could have produced different outcomes? This is how most Southerners would think, if this stuff rose to the level of conscious consideration, which it does not, because they are mostly…dumb. They don’t respect intelligence or learning, they equate it with homosexuality. The stupid jew bibble is enough to satisfy their tiny capacity for learning, wonder, and imagination. They also lack all sense of humor. So when you say to them, “You’re going to defeat the jew with that brain, with that way of looking at things, with that proven-fail pattern of behavior…?” – they don’t see what’s funny about that. I honestly see no hope in the South or Southerners at all. There are individuals from the region who are worthwhile, but the mass of them, save an active physical struggle, are simply bible primitives. It is beyond them to understand what is happening, let alone turn things in a different direction. A Southerner, in my opinion, is someone who can’t understand something AFTER it’s been explained to him. That’s unfair to say about many, but for most Southerners it’s spot-on.

Yeah, so, you were the one asserting the jews completely controlled the president, but as I showed, that was not the case. There was still wiggle room back then. As far as I know Eisenhower was the last to oppose Israel on something significant. And Piper shows that Kennedy, in private, opposed them too. And then he was killed. Since then, they have only been opposed in minor ways, by delaying loans or grants, or tiny remonstrations about some of their more publicly obnoxious mass murders. I would say it is fair to say our political system, including presidents, is controlled by them today, and probably since LBJ, which was when everything else went to shit, although that is best seen as as culmination of the work of decades of behind-the-scenes termitic activity on the part of the jew-commies.

I would say the jews print lies about jewish suffering in their mass media, and these claims are swallowed whole by christian retards suffused in a culture that worships the Ultimate Sufferer, Jew christ.

Christ-insanity is anti-White. Have I said that? Cuz itz pretty important.

Because he favored Israel over the US. If Piper’s theory is true, then he obviously would have feared assassination himself.

He espoused plenty of views. The Kennedys were big supporters of the America First Committee. I believe JFK’s older brother, the one Old Joe had his hopes pinned on to be president, organized an AFC chapter at Harvard.

You were the one denying that JFK could possibly oppose the jews. You obviously don’t know the history of the period or the relation between Kennedys and kikes. They were not all buddy-buddy. You think JFK would have written something respectful about Hitler in his book if jews had been as all-powerful then as they are today? Of course not. It’s quite plausible he didn’t want jews acquiring nuke power, because he knew, from the WASPs at State, that it was going to stir up a hornet’s nest in the middle east. Which it did.

There aren’t any refutations of the evidence he produces concerning the Izzy nukes matter. There are counter theories about the assassination, but his theory is better. I don’t claim it’s absolutely certain he’s right, as I do about Mossad producing ‘9/11.’ But from what I’ve seen, his is far and away the likeliest explanation. It’s very clear Israel had the motive, means and opportunity to murder Kennedy, and I think that’s just what they arranged.

If you have the facts, you don’t need a 400-page exposition of tangential material, which is what most books about the assassination are. Not to mention, what’s most compelling, to someone like me with little interest in the JFK murder beyond what’s “good for Whites” that can come out of the story, is exactly what Piper starts with, which is what I had always noticed and thought odd, but never seen anyone mention – until Piper. Namely, that the other theorists and theories about who killed JFK never mentioned Mossad. That alone is passing strange, given Mossad is the #1 assassination group in the entire world. The clear implication is that the alt-explanations are being managed as carefully by the mass media as the official Warren coverup. Again, directly parallel to WTC demolitions explanations. It’s harder to impose the lies today, but the attempt is always to divide explanations into two classes: muslims did it, or “our” government did it. If the internet didn’t exist, we wouldn’t even know about the accurate explanation: Israel did it. Back in JFK times, there was no internet, there were only three tv stations, and a bunch of jew-edited newspapers, and they could keep a lid on things. You can bet that Piper’s theory would have been out there as soon as the president was killed, and perhaps things would have gone a different direction – if the ‘net had existed back then. Against all these pertinent facts we have your manifest bias against Catholics and JFK. I don’t like Catholics or JFK, but I can see you’ve become unbalanced on the subject, just as on Lincoln.

I guess you’ve lost the ability to perceive my motive, but it is purely to understand these things. In my view, Piper’s theory is the likeliest to be correct. I hold no brief for Piper, JFK, Catholics or anybody else.

I have never advocated noble lying. I despise the WASPs it comes from, and I deny that people need religion, and i also deny that the very dumbest among us can’t handle the truth. It’s merely a matter of the form the truth is put into. Most people need things made simple for them, but making things simple is different from lying.

I’m a critic. I point out what’s wrong with things. I don’t come from one place, I lived all over the place. The places have a mix of qualities, like anywhere. I don’t like most atheists, they are usually leftist. But that doesn’t mean I’m going to deny they’re correct to reject the christian fantasy figures called god and jebus.

My interest is in raising a force that can contend for power. The people who have the power are jews. I watch what they do. I look at the demographic base of those most likely to oppose them. I see how the cultures match up, and why one side always comes out on top. I agitate to change that culture so it might be able to win, for once. That’s the source of my anti-Southern and anti-Christian diatribes. I deliver those critiques with heat and spice not just because that comes natural to me, but because I believe it is the most effective way to effect change in attitudes and perceptions.

He sure as hell is. I had never even heard the theory. I studied that period on college, there was never a word breathed about israeli nukes and Kennedy opposition. If his theory hasn’t gone farther, that’s not his fault.

Piper’s book came after all the others, not before. It’s also been through multiple editions. He’s aware of anything people can bring up. Far as I’m concerned, the fact that those prior to him never mentioned Mossad pretty much proves what’s going on. Not formally, but in a street sense.

What really matters about the theory is what concerns me: what’s good for Whites. The one demographic group that is both huge and more or less outside WN circles is – (Irish) Catholics. Imagine what learning that JEWS ASSASSINATED THEIR BELOVED JFK can do to turn them Whiteward. That’s the point.

If YOU have a better theory about who killed JFK and why, by all means put it foward. Until you do, Piper’s theory will stand.

By Alex Linder

[ The following is from a forum thread posting. ]

By Alex Linder

[ The following is from a forum thread posting. ]

The above was to the point that alienating christ-cultists, or winning them over, are irrelevant to the WN cause, as those christlings will neither make valuable allies, since they are weak under pressure, nor dangerous enemies, for the same reason. Wherever among the cult are real men, we trust them to figure out what is wrong, and join our cause, without our needing to appeal to them by any other means than our standard methods.

Again, consider my aphorism against received WN ‘wisdom’: only the unappealing need to appeal.

WN is an appealing cause, therefore it does NOT need to appeal to others, any more than a beautiful woman needs to call up men looking for dates.

If you want to play the Gay Waiter, and pursue the Gay Waiter Strategy of selling long island iced teas to bored housewives, join Warmfront, or the 1001 fools screeching out to the bored mass-morons by means of sucking up to them.

The GWS reminds me of a convention I covered when I was a trade journalist. A sweaty, desperate PR guy tried to dragoon me into a press conference for his company’s new product. I said, no, that product simply isn’t related to the stuff I write about, so it’s irrelevant to my readers. Poor guy, he was no doubt going to have an empty launch (there are many of these launches at the average trade convention, release of softgrades upgrades or new, minor products), and no doubt get chewed out by a senior exec for failing to drum up any interest.

Well, the desperation in that guy, the flopsweat, is what I sense when I read these clever tuckers who are going to “sell” WN by, basically, acting like faggots. We have to “appeal” to “voters.” You know how you appeal to women? By being a man. A man has inherent appeal to women. Why women? Because the masses are feminine. Not little old non-dictator, non-electee me saying that, Mr. Hitler saying that. A gay waiter has no inherent appeal to women, he has to pitch his wares, hard, and repeatedly to get them to buy, and when they do, their heart still isn’t really in it. WN is for men. Men and their women/children/familes – their clans. Republican Partyism is for faggots – literal faggots, wide-stancers, bathroom queers, and male cheerleading dicksuckers like George (I’m not kidding, his last name really is) Bush. The Republicans are the true party of the bush – male queers, bushmen as equals, and reaching out to women. Why in the world WN would wish to dupe these disgusting degenerates is beyond me. The party was formed to liberate the nigger; it will hardly be the tool of our own liberation.

If WN is nothing more than something to be voted on, then it’s not worth our time.

But no, WN is not up for vote. The survival of our race is to be guaranteed by any means necessary, and when you act like our success is based on selling jaded, bored, middle-class consumers that we are Republicans 2.0, you do the cause a disservice and make yourself appear a desperate fool.

Our task is not to persuade a numerical majority of the American population that we are right but rather to build the numerical minority of those whose values coincide with ours into a majority of will and determination. -William L. Pierce

The quotation from Pierce is right on target.

If the masses are feminine, as Hitler said, then what they respect is strength – as Hitler also said. So WN need not to appeal to people, they need to appear strong, and to actually be strong. As others have said, it’s not that people disagree with us, they don’t have profound beliefs, for the most part, they sway with the political winds. And we can even cite their behavioral tendencies as proof they are more WN than not, when it comes to the most intimate choices (mates and living location).

But they certainly are not heroes, nor are they idealists. If there’s much of a cost to a position, they simply won’t take it. To say the least, there is a cost to the WN position today. So right now, our business is attracting those undaunted by that cost. Enough of those, the cause becomes strong, the public sees it to be strong, and the cards flip from one side to the other.

That’s how it works.

It is an entirely different picture of things than the “we’ll get ’em by changings our positions, dress, speech, behavior until we find the one that clicks.” Which is a fundamental misconception of the problem before us.

By Alex Linder

[ The following is from a forum thread posting. ]

In Christendom men and women had personalities because they were receptive to the grace of God. In Liberaldom there are no human personalities because the citizens of Liberaldom have cut themselves off from God’s grace. What we see in Liberaldom as a substitute for genuine God-given humanity is assigned personhood. Some of the generic humans are told they are persons, as a liberal defines ‘person’. Representative Gifford, for instance, is a person because she does good liberal things. If she had been a white anti-abort senator such as Jesse Helms, or if she had been someone whom the liberals called a white racist, she would not have been deemed worthy of personhood and therefore would not have received even the fake compassion of the liberals. We must never forget, when dealing with liberals, that there will be no mercy shown to non-liberals, because liberals have denied Christ, who is the source of all mercy.

The lunatic’s point is that the left throws people into classes. Some to be exalted; others to be executed. Gee, where would the illberal (saved/damned) ever get that conception (saved/damned)? Correct, as far as it goes. But the christ-cult’s view is a distortion in the opposite direction: no generalization or pattern recognition among peoples is allowed because it leads to invidious, immoral discrimination and potentially categorical treatment on the basis of non-individual factors. Eeksome stuff to the christ-asparaguses. Christ-insanity and the Enlightenment illiberalism it hates are the same thing. They both ditch reality for ideology, leaving our race in the lurch, because we are Hell-bound immoral or guillotine-bound politically incorrect for acknowledging reality and responding to it realistically. “Niggers are destroying my neighborhood,” says the white man. “Niggers are fellow God’s creatures,” says the Cambrian lunatic. “They have souls. You cannot treat them as objects, only with love and respect. It’s not about what god’s darker children are doing to you, it’s about what you can do for them.” Well, my friends, do you like where your Jesus kool-aid has led us? Look around. Do you like this spiritual universalism, this other political equality? You like where it’s led? You want more of it? I mean what is the fucking real world we have to live in next to keeping scrubbed up for the REAL real world tomorrow…after we’re dead? You know. The one to come. The one we hear about but can’t prove the existence of by reference to mere atom. Yeah, that’s the one that matters. You like this, my Euro folk? You like being played for fools for thousands of years? Is there any form of dogshit you wouldn’t eat if someone told you it was “good” for you?

Or take the illberal ideology. “Niggers are destroying my neighborhood,” says the white man. “They are African-Americans, not ‘n-words,’ you racist redneck.” And such social pathology as you claim you believe you pretend you see is not actually there, and if it appears to be, it’s purely due to the legacy of slavery and your continued racism toward your moral superior. You owe the negro moral and legal restitution. That means pretending he’s as upright as you are in our mass media, and accepting discrimination against your kind at work, and denying you self-defense in your community. If that destroys your world, well, we won’t report it, and you deserve it anyway.”

Again, the takeaway here is: there is NO DIFFERENCE between the right-wing christ-cultist and the left-wing social engineer. They are goldberg variations on the same basic ideology: rejection of reality and demand that all accede in its replacement with this or that version of publicly-pretended fantasyland.

Sanity lies in the middle, with moderation, not ideology, as the Greeks knew. If you have a bedbug infection, it’s not moderate or reasonable policy to get rid of 80% of the bedbugs, or to banish them to a bed in the other room. It’s to kill every last freaking one of them, and their nits and eggs too. That is the MODERATE policy, and it applies to jews, who are, perforce, 1000x the threat to our community that their six-footed brothers are.* Our problems came on us precisely because we allowed the insanitarian crusaders of liberal Christ-insanity, to be redundant, to persuade our leaders that every implumous biped has a precious soul, and that nothing matters more than this soul, not the destruction of families, neighborhoods, or nations. When we accepted that we are morally forbidden from categorical treatment of “fellow” “creatures of God” we put our racial neck in the genocidal noose. This refusal to see, to think, to use our brain, to draw rational conclusions and act on them – this is a recipe for cultural and genetic death, given the disparity among races. Yet that’s the way “we,” today, want it; well, we get it. Do you like it? No, you don’t like it any better than I do. What’s the way out? To reject the lie of immorality and redefine our enemy as vermin, rather than soul-bearing Precious Moments(TM) nigurines and Collector Plate kikenvermin. And we know what to do with vermin. I mean, imagine if the extermination of silverfish, roaches and bedbugs was treated as a MORAL problem, rather than a hygiene problem?! But that is exactly what is going on here.

I am not joking or slurring when I call the christ-cultists insane. They quite literally are insane. There is not a goddam whit of difference between the Jesus jumpers and the Heaven’s Gate cult, except the christ-cult is wider spread, hence socially acceptable. The former prefers its suicide quick and tidy; the latter prefers it drawn out and drama-queeny.

Man, I ain’t going down with these losers. You shouldn’t either, if you have any last ounce of balls, brains, will or any other thing that christ-insanity looks down on with the hatred of the natural-born inferior.

Who killed Europe? The god fags killed Europe.

Christ-insanity was, is and will continue to be the worst thing that ever happened to the White race. So let’s ditch it and start winning, for a change.

By Alex Linder

The precise analogy of christianity is to a paralytic poison injected by a predator, say a spider, into a body it intends to eat. Christianity, a doctrine given form by a jew named Saul, exercises a paralytic effect on the Christian. It clouds his thinking, and thereby prevents him from defending himself and his kind.

[ The above is from a forum thread posting. ]

By Alex Linder

[ The following is from a forum thread posting. ]

Language needn’t be logical or regular to be useful. There’s no reason other than convention to drive on the right vs left, or to stop on red rather than green.

One uses conventional grammar and spelling to aid communication. One should only depart from these for solid reasons.

Of course, it is also true that the enemy attempts to regularize and routinize its lies and smears by making them conventional, through the coining and mass-media use of terms that are inherently dishonest – homophobia being a perfect example. The final success of these terms is when they are converted into legal concepts and written into laws. Terms coined by the judeo-left are devised to divide the world into two camps: the good guys, who support the leftists-commuist-jews, and the bad guys, who belong to yesterday’s reactionaries.

So, one should use neutral language as intended. One should coin new terms — or break rules — whenever it results in a tighter skin on reality, giving the reader a better grip on what’s actually going on. And one should root out and explode any deliberately misleading or deceptive language used by the enemy.

The judeo-left, as the aggressors, have for their advantage the fact that those they oppose are made up of stupid, cowardly and conformist types – which is to say 90% of the conservatives. That is not to say that the top ten percent of conservatives, the true intellectuals, are not worth infinitely more than all leftists combined, they are, but to say that if the left can gain control of society’s manure-spreaders (government instiutions, public schools, mass media) it can define reality to and for the stupid herds of conservatives, who will, most of them, not even perceive the game being played, and, the rest of them, fear to fight it.

[The following is from a forum thread. It presents the case for treating conservatives as the other liberals – attacking them as our enemies since they have all, down to the last one, sold out or truckled under to the dominant jew.]

.. Not that I care if you attack him or not, but other than the racialism aspect, I don’t see Pat and David being that different.

Other than balls, a gelding’s not that different from a stallion.

Pat is pro-white in every way that I can tell except he’s not explicitly racialist,

Slow your roll, nigger, and just think about how stupid the above statement is.

and I think that is because of our current state of affairs and wanting to keep his job rather than him being fundamentally anti-white.

So, to you, cowardice is acceptable in your political analyst or representative. Do you feel that way about your doctor, too? Do you go to a doctor who knows the disease you’re suffering from, but withholds the diagnosis and cure from you?

I could see your point to attack him, Alex, if that attack led to something positive. If you could get him fired, is David Duke going to take his place? Is the decline of conservatism related to the rise of white nationalism?

I would think you were baiting me if I didn’t know that dimness is about 95% likelier. I just got done writing the answer to that question. Ok, let me give it to you in the simplest words I can, Special Ed.

Yes. The rise of nationalism is almost a mathematical function of the decline of conservatism.

I’ll now slightly expand that answer.

Ordinary people, not all that different from you, are not real swift. They can barely distinguish the ground from the sky. Pat Buchanan is enough like us that it confuses people. The same can be said for all conservatives: they favor some of the same things we do (basically, acting normally – respect for the respectable in everyday life), which makes them, the conservatives, a plausible opponent to the weirdos of the left. Do you understand the implications that flow, for our position, from the fact that tens of millions of people believe that by supporting ‘the right’ they can effect the kind of political change we need to get back to Normal White America? If they think the solution lies within the system, i.e., through supporting one or other of the people/parties they see on tv/in the papers, then why the heck would they ever bother about us? I want you to take ten or fifteen days, however much time you need, to digest this point:

IF BUCHANAN CAN GET THE JOB DONE, WHY THE HECK DOES THE PUBLIC NEED US?

Now, if the public doesn’t need Buchanan, because he can’t get the job done…then the next epiphany is that Buchanan is an obstacle to the public seeing us, and pondering our case, and realizing that we alone, we White Nationalists, have what is needed to get the job done. Buchanan and his ilk are…in the way. He is on tv and in the papers daily. Our people are not. He’s close enough to our position, plausible enough a representative of normal-white interests, that masses of people, dim by nature, tired by overwork, just might be fooled by him. God knows they always have been. And that’s how we’ve ended up where we are. Now, Buchanan has no reason to change: his shtik and spiel have made him rich. WE ARE THE ONES WHO MUST CHANGE. So I don’t want to hear any shit about how I’m wrong in attacking little Catholic Patsy. Attacking conservatives as cowards and weaklings is precisely what we need. It is tactically even more important than attacking liberals, because the people we want already hate them, and their power is merely a function of their support for the jews’ agenda. We can’t polarize the public between Whites and jews until conservatives, the have-it-both-ways people, are roadkilled and dragged off on the shoulder. Only then does the political Chicken, begin…

Knocking Pat off the air is like knocking the flowers off a Pasadena New Year’s float. It shows the ugly chicken wire cage of jewish totalitarianism beneath the pretty colors and designs and smiling waving chesties. It reveals to the public what’s actually going on: naked jewish tyranny. No one who disagrees with the jews in any way is allowed face or sheet time in AmeriKwa. That awakening is good for our side. It is necessary. Pat Buchanan and other seemingly rational conservative geldings on tv and in the papers hurts our side, because they make it look like the system is open. For the mass of people, none to bright to begin with, and tired from work, can’t make out the difference. They don’t spend all day on the Internet studying politics. They’re working. They need things gross and crude, otherwise they’re going to be fooled by polished professionals like Pat. But if he doesn’t have the answers we need as a race, then it is in our interest that he be knocked off tv, because he can only mislead people as to the cause of our decline.

I’m pleonasming my ass off, but I really don’t think you dimwits won’t benefit from overbludgeoning. So just read more and think a little, or wave your feelers, or whatever you do to receive sensory input.

To repeat:

Ordinary dimwits cannot distinguish the White Nationalist position from the conservative position, since our side is kept off tv by the jews.

In order to make our presence known, we have to KNOCK THE CONSERVATIVES OUT OF THE WAY. The fact that they somewhat look like us, and that some of our policies overlap (anti-queer, anti-feminist, pro-borders, etc.) does not mean they are on our side. They are in fact spittingly hostile to us. They call us kooks, loons, crazies, basement dwellers – in short, there is no term of abuse used by the commie-jew-left against us that is not also used by the commie-jew-controlled-right. That ought to be a lesson to you dimwits, but, being tepid namby-pambies like 99% of white males, you just smooth over the differences like a wife who doesn’t want to make trouble. We’ll find a way to muddle through somehow, just pretend that we all get along, that we’re all on the same side. Even though we’re not, and it only helps the already rich and cowardly pretenders called conservatives who look down on us and do all they can to destroy our school and reputations to preserve their status as the real outsiders and alternative to the judeo-System. Nah, just pretend. “It’s better that way,” as the wigger in the Offspring song sings. Better to be a big fat stupid undiscriminating barren pussy like Starr or her cat than to stand up for yourself, your school, your leaders, your principles, your race. If you think Pat Buchanan is a good guy, and helping our cause, you are not a White Nationalist.

White nationalists have nearly as much difficulty as the average joe in understanding what’s going on in politics because:

a) they are nearly as dim-witted as pro wrestling fans;

b) they have never seen professional conservatism from the inside, so they think it is something other than “a game; a way of making a living,” as Joe Sobran called it.

Wise up, idiots. Pat Buchanan is not interested in standing up for you, he’s interested in getting into your wallet. WN Buchanan fans are the exact equivalent of a chick who thinks a guy really likes her when in fact he just wants sex. Pat’s interested in you watching him on tv and thinking he stands for the change you want. He isn’t, but if he can put on a good enough show to fool you, he’s got your money. And he knows you’re stupid. He knows, as he would put it, hard-core WN have “nowhere else to go.” No one else on tv even pretends to be right wing. That makes him the it girl. And until WN scorn him and demand better, he’s right. Again, if you support Buchanan, you are a conservative, not a White nationalist.

Fuck the Kwanservatives, we’re the Sex Pistols

What our White Nationalist cause needs to do to succeed is to polarize the nation between jews and White Nationalists. That means, in tardspeak, that the average dolt, let’s call him Special Mark, the guy who reads the paper for twenty minutes before dinner, must perceive that there are two competing visions out there, between which he can choose:

1) the judeo-System – the debt-sex-vice-sports-multicult vision

2) the White Nationalist system – a White nation without jews, muds or neo-morals

Polarizing the public between these positions is a tall order. It means destroying the dominant conceptual framework as it exists now: with false option A (liberals/Democrats) and false option B (conservatives/Republicans). Ordinary people cannot make out, without help, that there is not a dime’s worth of difference between right and left, they are two puppets pulled over the filthy claws of the eagle-nosed kike who actually runs things and makes all the decisions. It is our job to expose, reveal, destroy. Part of that revelation is beating the living hell out of the conservatives until ordinary people perceive them as the weaklings, laughingstocks, and System tools they are.

In practical terms, polarization entails demonizing and attacking the RIGHT, THE CONSERVATIVES, the PALEOCONSERVATIVES even more than the left-liberal-PC-communists. We should not only attack the fake right, the false opposition, we should attack them with joy and relish. Laughter indicates the laugher is or feels superior to the target. That’s exactly the meta-message the winning politician must communicate – that he is stronger than his opponent. That he is the bull goose in the pen. That is a lesson the conservative never understands, which is why he is always fighting uphill. Footnoting is for cowards and folks who don’t get it. At best it’s fill-in stuff. No footnote ever won a political battle. A political battle is just the human version of that nature channel perennial: the battle between bulls for mating rights. Bluffing is involved, and laughing is essential to bluffing, as ridicule can destroy anything. Anyone preferring reasoned discourse over laughter, if not an actual academic, to whom foonoting is proper, is very likely a coward or a dullard. We beat the jews by laughing at them and fighting them. Laughter is the proper means of verbal warfare. Not “proving” things. Not footnoting. Not remonstrating. Not being polite and respectful. Not playing along with appearances. Not not doubting motives. All those are for weaklings, for losers, for conservatives. We are not they. “I’m not like you [Kwanservative] Charlie Brown [with your fulsome MLKommie praise, your love of diversity, your pathetic and ineffectual puling], I have to win sometimes.” We White Nationalists are lions. Well, we’re cubs who might become lions if we act right. The conservatives are dung beetles. After the jews have eaten the wildebeest and pooped out the remains, the Pat Buchanans of “It’s Pat” fame crinkle by on their six little feet, and roll up the salubrious balls of dung on which they subsist. Do you want to be a lion or a dung beetle, White man?

If you agree there are things a grown man, a political analyst, can’t say, you are giving your seal of approval to the cowardice that is putting our race in the ground. You hurt our cause and you are not welcome at VNNForum. White nationalism has a higher standard than you are able to meet.

The conservatives, including Pat Buchanan, must be destroyed, run off, hounded into irrelevancy, so that the people can see that we, not he and his febrile faileocons, are the REAL alternative to the evil jews producing The System Show.

I really have been impressed these last few months at the childlike cluelessness of so many who think they are WN. The typical WN thinks he is displaying his sophistication when he makes excuses for why this or that kahnster dung beetle can’t say this or that.

Let me tell you, men of gerbil: You’re not sophisticated. You’re stupid dupes and dullards. You think Buchanan is really putting one over on the dominant kikes, and you’re right. He is putting one over. Not on the kikes. On you.

I have worked in these offices. I have taken the calls from liberal talking head A asking if conservative talkie B wants to go out for drinks after work. These guys are all buddies. They live the good life by putting on a Punch and Judy show for the mass morons like you. Some of the leftists might be honest about what they believe, since they can say EVERYTHING they want, qualified only by tactical advisability. But none of the rightists are anything but tools, except for the jewish neocons, who root and jew about with freedom, as they are kikes. As John Derbyshire at least had the courage to admit, everything he writes is conditioned by his fear of jews. If he displeases them, he has no job. Men who accept employment as political writers/analysts on terms that require them to relinquish their manhood and their independent judgment are unworthy of respect or subsidy. They are, rather, to be despised and spit on as weaklings. If you don’t agree with this statement, you are not a white nationalist. You are a conservative. Cowardice at no time in White history has been acceptable in a political leader. That is a horrid and disgusting innovation of the 20th century. Reject it.

Now is the first time in history that White men, almost across the board, willingly agreed to sacrifice their honor and their independence for a paycheck. Pat Buchanan and the rest of the paleocons are house eunuchs waving palm fronds for the Pet pashas who employ them. A white nationalist who praises Pat Buchanan and makes excuses for him is seen by me, and by Pat himself, as a fool. A man with no self respect has no respect for others too stupid to see him for what he is. Pat Buchanan knows how to wink and nod at WN in order to suck our money. And too many of you idiots think he’s helping us rather than helping himself by using us.

Pat Buchanan is dangerous to our cause because of his virtues – his learning and his political knowledge. He knows precisely how to affect that he is one of us. He know that hinting that he stands for all that is white and good is the way to fill his coffers. He also knows that that is his role within the jewish system. You have to give a little to get a little, the jewish tyrant knows. Pat is that giving a little. To maintain the fiction of an open system, there have to be at least a few people who appear, and appear plausibly, to oppose the powers that be. Pat Buchanan is precisely that man. As a good little Irish Catholic, PB always runs cringing and whimpering back to Authority, because that is his nature, and that is how he was raised and trained. Religious folks like PB have no problem with shitty, self-interested behavior as long as the dirt is done in private, and the facade kept up in public. The idea of saying the same thing in private as you do in public is foreign to the Christian, as is any ideal of manliness. Christianity is a shabby thing.

The White fool imagines that Buchanan aids our cause. The reality is that our cause aids Buchanan. Buchanan never says a word about White dispossession. He never says a word about jews controlling our government. He openly advised the Republicans to undercut the most successful White political candidate of the last 25 years, David Duke. Buchanan is a team player, and a System dolly all the way to the bank. WN is a cause that he can watch and steal the best arguments from, without crediting the men who thought them up – the revisionists now languishing in jail, for example. That way he can maximize his support base and shine up his radical veneer while staying safe with the jews. Most people, as I started and will end with, can’t make out a clever, well written conservative position coming from the pen of someone like Buchanan from a genuine white nationalist position. It is in our interest that we do everything possible to help them, and that surely and necessarily entails attacking and destroying Pat Buchanan. If you don’t agree with that position, you are not one of us. You are a conservative. Anything that obscures the difference between White nationalism and conservatism is detrimental to our cause.

Politics is a zero-sum game. Money and time that go to Pat Buchanan and the faileocons are money and attention that do not go to White nationalists. Any so-called WN who praises Buchanan and encourages us to support him is objectively damaging our cause – by aiding men who already possess tremendous material (money and tv access) advantages over us. Not to mention men who, whenver the question is put to them directly, denounce us.

Accept nothing but the real thing, White men.

Raise your standards.

By Alex Linder

Some people think trees should be allowed to stand around. All day. Doing nothing. I am not one of those people. Put trees to work, I always say. And I say it a lot.

I like seeing trees chopped down. Trees are kind of like niggers, when you think about it. All they really do is stand around and stink up the air and pollute the area around them with the detritus of their shady operations. Sometimes they fall on people and kill them. Trees are really just dark green forest niggers.

[ The above is from a forum thread posting. ]

By Alex Linder

[ The following is from a forum thread posting. ]

Let me put it this way: a termite chews wood without any malice whatsoever – he’s just doing what comes natural. BUT that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try to stop him. Certainly if we allow termites to have their way, in the end our house is destroyed. Their motive is completely irrelevant to the result! The same is true with Jews, except I don’t really buy Auster’s argument that there’s no malice behind Jewish activity. Maybe some Jews aren’t consciously malevolent, but many are. This is beyond argument. All anyone has to do is read the Talmud to understand this. Like wise with the Termites destroying a house, you allow Jews to have their way and your nation is destroyed.

Jews defile, and they enjoy defiling. They have a lot of malice and envy in them, a lot of hostility. They like dragging things down, verbally always, physically where they are allowed to get away with it. The best representation of the jew and the proper reaction to it is the nazi poster with the big blond disgusted Aryan mucking the beglassticled expostulating kike out of society on the end of a pitchfork. Jews are a people-shaped animal without grace, honor or dignity; they do not belong among us.

It’s not Auster worth worrying about. Jared Taylor is the one to watch. It was his type that lost this country in the first place – the high-IQ WASP effetes who allowed the jews to take over when they cried, because they didn’t want to make a scene. Must never doubt a man’s motives. Treat others as we want to be treated. Note the way this all flies out the door when the effete WASP encounters someone willing to address the problem people directly. Jared’s “not taking a position on the jewish question” = “they look white to me,” and “no criticism of jews will be allowed at AmRen.” Taylor takes a position on jews. His position is that Whites must never criticize them, only themselves. That jews are to be treated as Whites, even though they aren’t. That jews can insult White leaders like Duke, but Whites must remain polite and turn the other cheek. Whites must fight to overturn the 1965 Immigration Act, but never acknowledge that it was jewish pressure alone that made it law. Whites must fight to rescind the law that denied us free association back in the sixties, but never acknowledge that it was jews who criminalized it. Even though it was the jews who brought us the laws reducing whites to terrorized slaves in their own land; even though the jews who created these conditions are more firmly entrenched in power than ever, we must never, ever mention those facts and stick to blaming our White parents and grandparents, for they are the real problem.

By Alex Linder

Well, its quite difficult to ascertain what national socialism is. You have to understand, I was a businessman at one point. A journalist and a publisher and a marketer. I have great respect for private business and how difficult it is to make a profit, and how much hard work goes into it. To the extent national socialism undercuts any of that and rewards cartels rather than private enterprises, I’m against it. I just believe, and am willing to kill over it, that private businessmen should not be allowed to undermine the racial basis of the state to make money. I can’t justify that, nor do I try to. It’s my preference.

But WITHIN the white state, I do NOT believe government should be involved at all in health care or schooling. Maybe for a few years, as the lessons of the jew tyrannary are undone, but after that, no. I don’t want to exchange jew tyranny for white tyranny if the average white man like me is still treated as an adult child who can’t have any guns, poisons, power tools, etc. White men are not children. I won’t tolerate any government that doesn’t leave them their balls and their brains.

I wish some of you Germans would trust me that there is just a little something British have right, and that is the speed, quickness and inventiveness of leaping to serve new markets. Even if many of these are evil or anti-racial, don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater.

The whole point of being White is that one size doesn’t fit all. We are not a bunch of bedbugs like mexicans. Or ants like Asians. That’s why the only system that truly fits us is decentralization and privacy. We don’t need government. We can do things ourselves. I don’t want to be coopted into a grand mission to go to Pluto, I just want someone sane, rational and more or less money-clean to take care of the drainage. I live in a lower-middle-class town. The ex-mayor is a convicted arsonist. Half the town council can be found drunk behind the wheel on a Tuesday. You know what? The city’s in great shape, and the books are always in the black. Even the lowest whites can run a city/county/country without any self-imagined high-firepowers like me telling ’em what’s up. Whites have what it takes. They don’t need anything but a few neighbors for everything but racial self defense.

Once we take power, and clean out the jews and hose out the mud, the only function govt needs after that is collective racial self-defense. On foreign policy, we simply make deals with the Asians, or even Israel, since it has nukes. We make them on terms that favor Whites, or are equal. We maintain the greatest weapons, and, more important, a national college of racial science. The government has ZERO business in health care, education, cars, etc. That is for the states, which are powerful entities, as the cantons in Die Schweiz today, and the states before The War Between (Them). This is the model that fits our personality – at our best. Decentralized. Flexible. Laugh-filled. Serious but calm, not moralizing. We reject WASP crusading. We reject dirt-eating Christian next-world assininity. But our government is all-powerful,militarily, but honor-code bound to a SINGLE function, and citizenship is exclusively and overtly racial. Hell, we take up a collection and pay Prozium to write a new charter, I’m sure he would do a fine job. We get a White curriculum that Whites can use. But if they want to be Catholic or Baptist, that’s fine too. Only they lose their tax status. They’re just another piece of proper, which is as it should be. They get no special hatred in the press, although people like me are free to try to laugh them to death, but neither do they get any special tax advantages like they do now.

We can’t force people to be White. And if we do, all we get are adult children. They have to choose it themselves. If the government and media are in the right hands, and if there is no social sanction against it, they WILL choose to be White. I’m quite sure of that. All the jews are doing is forcing us to make explicit what we never had to before. We’re better than them. We don’t need them. As they will not let us live the way we want, we will destroy them. And we will live as White men, in orderly freedom, with respect for all that is respectable – achievement, ingenuity, genius, humor, endurance. And we will not subsidize any goddamned religion, neither will we subsidize failure. The govenrment will have ONE purpose alone, and be sworn to uphold it, perhaps even to the point of a death lottery to ensure the bureacrat’s moral seriousness, and the rest will be left to Aryan genius. Don’t be like generals studying the last war. The libertarians are wrong about the big things, but on the small things they are very often correct. Hitler and the NS were nothing but hip to improvements and advances by other people, regardless of the origin. That’s the soul of NS, that’s the soul of White. Look, learn, laugh, love, fight, breed, bleed. We aren’t littly nobby jews, nattering into our cel phones. We aren’t filthy niggers, eating doritos and beating our pit bulls. We aren’t fifty cucaracha bedbugs in a single bedroom apartment. We are White. We have what it takes. It is time now to assert that.

[ The above is from a forum thread posting. ]